These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19145014)

  • 21. Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: constraints on the construction of structural descriptions.
    Schacter DL; Cooper LA; Delaney SM; Peterson MA; Tharan M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 1826731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Constrained formation of object representations.
    O'Connor KJ; Potter MC
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Mar; 13(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11933992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Similarity and the development of rules.
    Gentner D; Medina J
    Cognition; 1998 Jan; 65(2-3):263-97. PubMed ID: 9557385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recognition-induced forgetting is not due to category-based set size.
    Maxcey AM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):187-97. PubMed ID: 26503324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory and visual spatial working memory.
    Lehnert G; Zimmer HD
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1080-90. PubMed ID: 17128606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Influence of typical size of objects in a categorization task].
    Ferrier L; Staudt A; Reilhac G; Jiménez M; Brouillet D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 18266507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wistar rats show episodic-like memory for unique experiences.
    Kart-Teke E; De Souza Silva MA; Huston JP; Dere E
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2006 Mar; 85(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 16290193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Looking at pictures but remembering scenes.
    Intraub H; Bender RS; Mangels JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jan; 18(1):180-91. PubMed ID: 1532019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effects.
    Lacey S; Campbell C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):361-76. PubMed ID: 16618639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.
    Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Extracommunicative functions of language: verbal interference causes selective categorization impairments.
    Lupyan G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Aug; 16(4):711-8. PubMed ID: 19648457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.
    Rogers TT; Lambon Ralph MA; Garrard P; Bozeat S; McClelland JL; Hodges JR; Patterson K
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):205-35. PubMed ID: 14756594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning.
    Zeithamova D; Maddox WT
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 16752602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: dramatic effects of category learning during test.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2088-96. PubMed ID: 18265623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):662-79. PubMed ID: 18444763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for.
    Murphy GL; Wisniewski EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):572-86. PubMed ID: 2526854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conceptual implicit memory: a developmental study.
    Perruchet P; Frazier N; Lautrey J
    Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):220-8. PubMed ID: 7753952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conceptual coherence affects phonological activation of context objects during object naming.
    Oppermann F; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):587-601. PubMed ID: 18444758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.