These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19145023)

  • 1. Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory.
    Goolsby BA; Shapiro KL; Raymond JE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 19145023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.
    De Vito D; Ferrey AE; Fenske MJ; Al-Aidroos N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 29546688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory.
    De Vito D; Al-Aidroos N; Fenske MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():259-269. PubMed ID: 28341131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning in repeated visual search.
    Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1267-82. PubMed ID: 20601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search.
    Hollingworth A; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):936-49. PubMed ID: 19429970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suppression on the basis of template for rejection is reactive: Evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pang C; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Nan W; Fu S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1148-1162. PubMed ID: 38491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of working memory in attentional capture.
    Lavie N; De Fockert J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 16447380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating effects of stimulus identity and load on working memory attentional guidance: lengthening encoding time eliminates the effect of load but not identity.
    Tsvetanov KA; Arvanitis TN; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1475-83. PubMed ID: 22712531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection.
    Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Soto D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):639-46. PubMed ID: 22528872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.
    Balani AB; Soto D; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1058-76. PubMed ID: 21156870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).
    Lavie N; Torralbo A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2022 Feb; 22(2):8. PubMed ID: 35156992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional distractor interference may be diminished by concurrent working memory load in normal participants and traumatic brain injury patients.
    Gil-Gómez de Liaño B; Umiltà C; Stablum F; Tebaldi F; Cantagallo A
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 20846773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distractor devaluation in a flanker task: object-specific effects without distractor recognition memory.
    Martiny-Huenger T; Gollwitzer PM; Oettingen G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):613-25. PubMed ID: 24016067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.
    Williams LH; Drew T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 33000442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-based working memory guidance of visual attention.
    Chen Z; Tsou BH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1082-95. PubMed ID: 21264740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.