These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19145027)
1. '100% of anything looks good': the appeal of one hundred percent. Li M; Chapman GB Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 19145027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks. Oppenheimer DM Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 14738516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions. Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to eliminate illusions in quantified reasoning. Yang Y; Johnson-Laird PN Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):1050-9. PubMed ID: 11105531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian view of covariation assessment. McKenzie CR; Mikkelsen LA Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):33-61. PubMed ID: 16764849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cost of anchoring on credit-card minimum repayments. Stewart N Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 19152539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Wakslak C; Trope Y Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19076317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pseudocontingencies: an integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion. Fiedler K; Freytag P; Meiser T Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):187-206. PubMed ID: 19159153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Probability matching and strategy availability. Koehler DJ; James G Mem Cognit; 2010 Sep; 38(6):667-76. PubMed ID: 20852231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Who "believes" in the Gambler's Fallacy and why? Farmer GD; Warren PA; Hahn U J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 28054813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. Denes-Raj V; Epstein S J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 May; 66(5):819-29. PubMed ID: 8014830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probability judgment in hierarchical learning: a conflict between predictiveness and coherence. Lagnado DA; Shanks DR Cognition; 2002 Feb; 83(1):81-112. PubMed ID: 11814487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events. Wakslak CJ; Trope Y; Liberman N; Alony R J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):641-53. PubMed ID: 17087578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the ability of monitoring non-veridical perceptions and uncertain knowledge: some calibration studies. Keren G Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 May; 67(2):95-119. PubMed ID: 3407444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Six of one, half dozen of the other: expanding and contracting numerical dimensions produces preference reversals. Burson KA; Larrick RP; Lynch JG Psychol Sci; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1074-8. PubMed ID: 19572972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. More accurate size contrast judgments in the Ebbinghaus Illusion by a remote culture. de Fockert J; Davidoff J; Fagot J; Parron C; Goldstein J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):738-42. PubMed ID: 17563234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the factors that encourage the illusions of control: the case of preventive illusions. Blanco F; Matute H Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 25384640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geometrical illusions are not always where you think they are: a review of some classical and less classical illusions, and ways to describe them. Ninio J Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():856. PubMed ID: 25389400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]