These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19145033)

  • 1. The disutility of the hard-easy effect in choice confidence.
    Merkle EC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 19145033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for overconfidence in judgment under uncertainty.
    Hansson P; Juslin P; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1027-42. PubMed ID: 18763889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting binary choices from probability phrase meanings.
    Wallsten TS; Jang Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 18792503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An application of the poisson race model to confidence calibration.
    Merkle EC; Van Zandt T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):391-408. PubMed ID: 16846271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty.
    See KE; Fox CR; Rottenstreich YS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1385-402. PubMed ID: 17087591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: a critical examination of the hard-easy effect.
    Juslin P; Winman A; Olsson H
    Psychol Rev; 2000 Apr; 107(2):384-96. PubMed ID: 10789203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model for realism of confidence judgments: implications for underconfidence in sensory discrimination.
    Ferrell WR
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):246-54; discussion 255-9. PubMed ID: 7885823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals.
    Juslin P; Winman A; Hansson P
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):678-703. PubMed ID: 17638502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Good Choice, Bad Judgment: How Choice Under Uncertainty Generates Overoptimism.
    Tong J; Feiler D; Ivantsova A
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):254-265. PubMed ID: 29283751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks.
    Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 14738516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence.
    Gigerenzer G; Hoffrage U; Kleinbölting H
    Psychol Rev; 1991 Oct; 98(4):506-28. PubMed ID: 1961771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges.
    Ariely D; Au WT; Bender RH; Budescu DV; Dietz CB; Gu H; Wallsten TS; Zauberman G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Jun; 6(2):130-47. PubMed ID: 10937317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judgment under conditions of uncertainty.
    Wurzbach ME
    Nurs Forum; 1991; 26(3):27-34. PubMed ID: 1945955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Likelihood judgments and sequential effects in a two-choice probability learning situation.
    ANDERSON NH; WHALEN RE
    J Exp Psychol; 1960 Aug; 60():111-20. PubMed ID: 13793433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The consequences of surrendering a degree of freedom to the participant in a contingency assessment task.
    Hannah S; Allan LG; Siegel S
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 17081705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.
    Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events.
    Wakslak CJ; Trope Y; Liberman N; Alony R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):641-53. PubMed ID: 17087578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Children's understanding of posterior probability.
    Girotto V; Gonzalez M
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):325-44. PubMed ID: 17391661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty.
    Fox CR
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):167-89. PubMed ID: 10090802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.