These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19146296)
1. Inter-trial inhibition of attention to features is modulated by task relevance. Levinthal BR; Lleras A J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19146296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention. Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age-related effects in inter-trial inhibition of attention. Wan X; Voss M; Lleras A Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2011 Sep; 18(5):562-76. PubMed ID: 21756189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task. Kristjánsson A Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency. Kumada T Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture. Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target. Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it. Caddigan E; Lleras A J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):9. PubMed ID: 21135256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does. Lamy D; Yashar A Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search. Yashar A; Lamy D Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. Lamy D; Egeth HE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object. Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facilitation and inhibition effects in visual selective attention processes of individuals with and without mental retardation. Cha KH; Merrill EC Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):594-600. PubMed ID: 8192905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations? Lee H; Mozer MC; Vecera SP Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1059-71. PubMed ID: 19525537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency. Wei P; Zhou X Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Lamy D; Antebi C; Aviani N; Carmel T Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18054983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. Becker SI J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 20438251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination. Fujisaki W; Nishida S Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]