These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19146346)

  • 21. Dynamic brain activation patterns for face recognition: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Lee D; Simos P; Sawrie SM; Martin RC; Knowlton RC
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16193263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics.
    Harris AM; Duchaine BC; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2125-36. PubMed ID: 16243056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG.
    Itier RJ; Herdman AT; George N; Cheyne D; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Familiarity and face processing.
    Osborne CD; Stevenage SV
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 22906071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise.
    Xu Y; Liu J; Kanwisher N
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):588-97. PubMed ID: 15716149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 22642217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The neural processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces: a review and synopsis.
    Natu V; O'Toole AJ
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):726-47. PubMed ID: 21988381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Early cortical responses are sensitive to changes in face stimuli.
    Susac A; Ilmoniemi RJ; Pihko E; Ranken D; Supek S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():155-64. PubMed ID: 20510886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selective interference on the holistic processing of faces in working memory.
    Cheung OS; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):448-61. PubMed ID: 20364929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage.
    Caldara R; Schyns P; Mayer E; Smith ML; Gosselin F; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1652-66. PubMed ID: 16269103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modulation of neuromagnetic responses to face stimuli by preceding biographical information.
    Tsujimoto S; Yokoyama T; Noguchi Y; Kita S; Kakigi R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 34(12):2043-53. PubMed ID: 22098602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiple contributions to priming effects for familiar faces: analyses with backward masking and event-related potentials.
    Dörr P; Herzmann G; Sommer W
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):765-82. PubMed ID: 21988383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces.
    Jemel B; Schuller AM; Goffaux V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2289-305. PubMed ID: 19642891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Face recognition and cortical responses: effect of stimulus duration.
    Tanskanen T; Näsänen R; Ojanpää H; Hari R
    Neuroimage; 2007 May; 35(4):1636-44. PubMed ID: 17412612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploring the functional architecture of person recognition system with event-related potentials in a within- and cross-domain self-priming of faces.
    Jemel B; Pisani M; Rousselle L; Crommelinck M; Bruyer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2024-40. PubMed ID: 16243050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Personally familiar faces are perceived categorically in face-selective regions other than the fusiform face area.
    Ramon M; Dricot L; Rossion B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 32(9):1587-98. PubMed ID: 20880360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H; Brady N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 15903116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging.
    Vuilleumier P; Pourtois G
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(1):174-94. PubMed ID: 16854439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.