98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1914727)
21. Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer.
Ychou M; Duffour J; Kramar A; Gourgou S; Grenier J
Dis Markers; 2000; 16(3-4):105-10. PubMed ID: 11381189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. CEA, CA 242, CA 19-9, CA 72-4 and hCGbeta in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer.
Carpelan-Holmström M; Louhimo J; Stenman UH; Alfthan H; Järvinen H; Haglund C
Tumour Biol; 2004; 25(5-6):228-34. PubMed ID: 15627885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Monitoring of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels after Curative Resection of Colon Cancer: Cutoff Values Determined according to Preoperative Levels Enhance the Diagnostic Accuracy for Recurrence.
Saito G; Sadahiro S; Kamata H; Miyakita H; Okada K; Tanaka A; Suzuki T
Oncology; 2017; 92(5):276-282. PubMed ID: 28178692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The usefulness of CEA and/or CA19-9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients: a prospective clinical study.
Takahashi Y; Takeuchi T; Sakamoto J; Touge T; Mai M; Ohkura H; Kodaira S; Okajima K; Nakazato H;
Gastric Cancer; 2003; 6(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 14520526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma.
Gaspar MJ; Arribas I; Coca MC; Díez-Alonso M
Tumour Biol; 2001; 22(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 11553862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Serum CA 242 and CEA detect different patients with recurrent colorectal cancer.
Carpelan-Holmström MA; Haglund CH; Järvinen HJ; Roberts PJ
Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(2):981-6. PubMed ID: 8687164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical assessment and prognostic evaluation of tumor markers in patients with gastric cancer.
Jiexian J; Xiaoqin X; Lili D; Baoguo T; Ting S; Xianwen Z; Cunzhi H
Int J Biol Markers; 2013 Jun; 28(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23787496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Study on carbohydrate antigen NCC-ST-439 in breast cancer].
Suzuki S; Nihei M; Nomizu T; Watanabe T; Kimijima I; Tsuchiya A; Abe R
Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi; 1990 May; 25(5):1019-26. PubMed ID: 2202768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Value of serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA, and gastrointestinal cancer antigen, GICA or CA 19-9, for preoperative staging and postoperative monitoring of patients with colorectal carcinoma.
Szymendera JJ; Nowacki MP; Kozłowicz-Gudzińska I; Kowalska M
Dis Colon Rectum; 1985 Dec; 28(12):895-9. PubMed ID: 3864628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does serum CA19-9 play a practical role in the management of patients with colorectal cancer?
Morita S; Nomura T; Fukushima Y; Morimoto T; Hiraoka N; Shibata N
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Feb; 47(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 15043294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of four serum tumour markers in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma.
van der Schouw YT; Verbeek AL; Wobbes T; Segers MF; Thomas CM
Br J Cancer; 1992 Jul; 66(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 1379057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combined measurement of the c-erbB-2 protein in breast carcinoma tissues and sera is useful as a sensitive tumor marker for monitoring tumor relapse.
Sugano K; Ushiama M; Fukutomi T; Tsuda H; Kitoh T; Ohkura H
Int J Cancer; 2000 Jul; 89(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 10956406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Study on the clinical usefulness of NCC-ST-439 in breast cancer].
Takahashi H; Nakanishi K; Taguchi K; Hasumi T; Hamada H; Sasaki F; Hata Y; Uchino J
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1991 Feb; 18(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 1992918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Clinical significance of a tumor marker NCC-ST-439 in breast cancer--a comparative study with CA 15-3, CEA and TPA].
Okamura Y; Takatsuka Y; Katoh T; Tsumura I; Kobayakawa K; Kawahara T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1991 Jul; 18(8):1279-85. PubMed ID: 2069399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA and GICA in colo-rectal tumors. A caseload contribution].
Lasagna B; Balbo G; De Paolis P; Sacchetti M
Minerva Med; 1990 Nov; 81(11):769-71. PubMed ID: 2255411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Evaluation of CA72-4 as a tumor marker in patients with gastric cancer].
Ubukata H; Katano M; Motohashi G; Kasuga T; Takemura A; Tabuchi T; Tabuchi T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2003 Oct; 30(11):1821-4. PubMed ID: 14619529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring despite normal preoperative values in node-positive colon cancer patients.
Zeng Z; Cohen AM; Urmacher C
Dis Colon Rectum; 1993 Nov; 36(11):1063-8. PubMed ID: 8223061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen19-9 and carbohydrate antigen 125 as prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival in colorectal cancer.
Yang XQ; Chen C; Wang FB; Peng CW; Li Y
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(5):1251-6. PubMed ID: 21875276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Analysis of prognostic factors after radical resection in 628 patients with stage II or III colon cancer].
Qin Q; Yang L; Zhou AP; Sun YK; Song Y; DU F; Wang JW
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 35(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 23880003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of serum CA 195 and carcinoembryonic antigen in metastatic carcinoma.
Verdi CJ; Ahmann FR; Schifman RB; Elvick AL; Ahmann ME; Marx PC
Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(11):3625-32. PubMed ID: 8490911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
