BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19148188)

  • 1. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams.
    Boyer DB; Roth L
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8054193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations.
    Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations.
    Della Bona A; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin.
    Smales RJ
    Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 1830747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bonded amalgam restoration: a case report.
    Gonçalves M; Ferreira de Albuquerque Júnior R; de Motta Mde F; Polloni S; Pedrazzi V
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Mar; 29(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 9643252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA; Mastrodomenico J; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longevity of cusp-covered amalgams: survivals after 15 years.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 1784534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Bonded amalgams. An important change in operatory dentistry].
    Padros Fradera E; Padros Serrat JL; Serrat Caballeria A; Padros Serrat E
    Rev Eur Odontoestomatol; 1991; 3(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 2064690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
    Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: nine-year results among children and adults.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Adair SM; Sams DR; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Hawkins KI; Mackert JR; O'Dell NL; Richards EE; Rueggeberg F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 7608378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A long-term prospective study of the etched-cast restoration.
    Barrack G; Bretz WA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(5):428-34. PubMed ID: 8297451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longevity of restorations in a dental school clinic.
    Bentley C; Drake CW
    J Dent Educ; 1986 Oct; 50(10):594-600. PubMed ID: 3463598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longevity of posterior restorations.
    Mjör IA; Jokstad A; Qvist V
    Int Dent J; 1990 Feb; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 2407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibition in vitro of caries around amalgam restorations by bonding amalgam to tooth structure.
    Torii Y; Staninec M; Kawakami M; Imazato S; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y
    Oper Dent; 1989; 14(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 2700384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of four dental amalgams over a two year period.
    van der Merwe WJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1992 Dec; 47(12):521-5. PubMed ID: 9511639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Rueggeberg FA; Adair SM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 129(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9448347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.