These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19148188)

  • 21. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin.
    Smales RJ
    Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 1830747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Fontana UF; Cury JA; Serra MC; Elderton RJ
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9728147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An evaluation of the performance of cast gold bonded restorations in clinical practice, a retrospective study.
    Jamous I; Sidhu S; Walls A
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 16919861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations.
    Mahler DB; Engle JH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The bonded amalgam restoration: a case report.
    Gonçalves M; Ferreira de Albuquerque Júnior R; de Motta Mde F; Polloni S; Pedrazzi V
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Mar; 29(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 9643252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adaptation and condensation of amalgam restorations in Class II preparations of conventional and conservative design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 1410252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice. Part 2, early failure.
    Stewardson DA; Thornley P; Bigg T; Bromage C; Browne A; Cottam D; Dalby D; Gilmour J; Horton J; Roberts E; Westoby L; Creanor S; Burke T
    Br Dent J; 2011 Jun; 210(11):E19. PubMed ID: 21659987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The survival of Class V restorations in general dental practice: part 3, five-year survival.
    Stewardson D; Creanor S; Thornley P; Bigg T; Bromage C; Browne A; Cottam D; Dalby D; Gilmour J; Horton J; Roberts E; Westoby L; Burke T
    Br Dent J; 2012 May; 212(9):E14. PubMed ID: 22576479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results.
    Sachdeo A; Gray GB; Sulieman MA; Jagger DC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15058177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A retrospective observational study of the effect of surface treatments and cementing media on the durability of gold palatal veneers.
    Chadwick RG; Linklater KI
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 15646214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students.
    Overton JD; Sullivan DJ
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 22383602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study.
    Nagasiri R; Chitmongkolsuk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 15674228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Short-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity with bonded amalgams.
    Kennington LB; Davis RD; Murchison DF; Langenderfer WR
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 10388372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.