These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19148382)

  • 1. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials.
    Faria AC; Rodrigues RC; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 19148382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effect on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays].
    Ishida K
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 33(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 2489749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of stone casts made from silicone-based impression materials and three impression techniques.
    Vitti RP; da Silva MA; Consani RL; Sinhoreti MA
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 24474292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures.
    Dounis GS; Ziebert GJ; Dounis KS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 2051350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impressions for crown and bridge work--an investigation and review.
    Carrotte PV; Johnson A; Winstanley RB
    Br Dent J; 1998 Dec 12-26; 185(11-12):580-5. PubMed ID: 9885431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Habib AN; Shehata MT
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1409-16. PubMed ID: 9497690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.
    Larson TD; Nielsen MA; Brackett WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 12131884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linear dimensional changes in plaster die models using different elastomeric materials.
    Pereira JR; Murata KY; Valle AL; Ghizoni JS; Shiratori FK
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 20877972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.