These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19148383)

  • 1. Assessment of the tensile strength of hexagonal abutments using different cementing agents.
    Wahl C; França FM; Brito RB; Basting RT; Smanio H
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19148383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tensile strength of cementing agents on the CeraOne system of dental prosthesis on implants.
    Montenegro AC; Machado AN; Depes Gouvêa CV
    Implant Dent; 2008 Dec; 17(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 19077583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of cementing agent and technique on the retention of a CeraOne gold cylinder: a pilot study.
    Koka S; Ewoldsen NO; Dana CL; Beatty MW
    Implant Dent; 1995; 4(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 7550082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns.
    Covey DA; Kent DK; St Germain HA; Koka S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 10709044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of different types of temporary cements on the tensile strength and marginal adaptation of crowns on implants.
    Akashia AE; Francischone CE; Tokutsune E; da Silva W
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 12666750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 17302949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Bogacki MT; Tietge JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):737-41. PubMed ID: 1432793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of height and surface roughness of abutments and the type of cement on bond strength of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Abu-Sitta EH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 21039897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prostheses: a preliminary in vitro study.
    Garg P; Gupta G; Prithviraj DR; Pujari M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 23342339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of temporary cements on the microtensile bond strength of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cement.
    Carvalho EM; Carvalho CN; Loguercio AD; Lima DM; Bauer J
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):762-9. PubMed ID: 24837710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.
    Song MY; An H; Park EJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e210-e215. PubMed ID: 28598530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.