65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19148433)
1. [Influence of adequacy of the sample on detection of the precursor lesions of the cervical cancer].
Amaral RG; Manrique EJ; Guimarães JV; Sousa PJ; Mignoli JR; Xavier Ade F; Oliveira A
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2008 Nov; 30(11):556-60. PubMed ID: 19148433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical smear adequacy: cellularity references were found to increase both interobserver agreement and unsatisfactory rate.
Moore D; Pugh-Cain D; Walker T
Cytopathology; 2009 Jun; 20(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 18713249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Cervicovaginal Cytopathological Samples Collected in Basic Health Units and in Private Clinics in the Midwest of Santa Catarina.
Dallazem B; Dambrós BP; Gamba CO; Perazzoli M; Kirschnick A
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 40(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 29253911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The determination of Papanicolaou smear adequacy using a semiquantitative method to evaluate cellularity.
Valente PT; Schantz HD; Trabal JF
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(6):576-80. PubMed ID: 1769285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations in Progression and Regression of Precancerous Lesions of the Uterine Cervix on Cytology Testing Among Women of Different Races.
Martingano D; Renson A; Martingano AJ; Martingano FX
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2018 Jan; 118(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 29309102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated screening of conventional gynecological cytology smears: feasible and reliable.
Saieg MA; Motta TH; Fodra ME; Scapulatempo C; Longatto-Filho A; Stiepcich MM
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 25195537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variation in the assessment of adequacy in cervical smears.
Migliore G; Rossi E; Aldovini A; Mudu P; Alderisio M; Giovagnoli MR; Fabiano A; Morosini PL; Branca M
Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 11843939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficacy of an endocervical brush in obtaining adequate Papanicolaou smears.
Grossman MB; Clofine R
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 Sep; 91(9):875-9. PubMed ID: 1757278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atypical glandular cells in conventional cervical smears: incidence and follow-up.
Scheiden R; Wagener C; Knolle U; Dippel W; Capesius C
BMC Cancer; 2004 Jul; 4():37. PubMed ID: 15257755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of Cervical Cancer Screening by Liquid-Based Cytology as Part of Routine Antenatal Assessment.
Parkpinyo N; Inthasorn P; Laiwejpithaya S; Punnarat T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4457-4461. PubMed ID: 27797261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of 4-quadrant biopsies under colposcopy for detecting precancerous lesions in cervical cancer screening].
Zhao Y; Song Y; Zhao F; Zhang W; Li L; Chen F; Chen W; Pan Q; Shen G; Qiao Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Nov; 37(11):875-9. PubMed ID: 26887523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quality and performance of pap smears in the cervical cancer screening program in a city of southern Brazil].
Uchimura NS; Nakano K; Nakano LC; Uchimura TT
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2009; 55(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 19918658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External quality assurance in cervical/vaginal cytology: Interlaboratory agreement in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy.
Cocchi V; Sintoni C; Carretti D; Sama D; Chiari U; Segala V; Delazer AL; Grilli N; Papaleo R; Ghirardini C; Bucchi L
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 8669183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pap smear screening in an urban STD clinic. Yield of screening and predictors of abnormalities.
Shlay JC; McGill WL; Masloboeva HA; Douglas JM
Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Oct; 25(9):468-75. PubMed ID: 9800258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study.
Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ström P; Ploner A; Elfström KM; Arnheim-Dahlström L; Dillner J; Sparén P
BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i276. PubMed ID: 26869597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
