These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19148446)

  • 1. [Influence of chin prominence on anterior-posterior lip positions of facial profile].
    Su YY; Wang CL; Liu DX; Dong RP; Li H
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Dec; 17(6):598-602. PubMed ID: 19148446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15898368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antero-posterior and vertical facial type variations influence the aesthetic preference of the antero-posterior lip positions.
    Murakami T; Kataoka T; Tagawa J; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 26453593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of anteroposterior lip positions in the most-favored Iranian facial profiles using silhouette.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Sep; 10(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 24910646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of facial convexity on facial attractiveness in Japanese.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 17973684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Antero-Posterior Lip Position in Most Favored Facial Profile of Jaipur Population.
    Sharma K; Trehan M; Singh S; Mahlawat H; Kenkare P; Jayavarma S A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27774. PubMed ID: 36106287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored facial profiles of Korean and Japanese people.
    Ioi H; Shimomura T; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 18929266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
    Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of preferred lip positions according to different age groups.
    Park NS; Park JH; Bayome M; Mo SS; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 42(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 23141151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of preferred lip position according to different tip rotations of the nose in class I young adult subjects.
    Feghali J; Khoury E; Souccar NM; Akl R; Ghoubril J
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 31231000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Observer's Sex and Chin Prominences on the Perception of the Lower Lip-Chin Prominence Angle.
    Lee JY; Han SH; Choi YK; Kim J; Park SB; Kim YI
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Mar-Apr 01; 33(2):620-623. PubMed ID: 34519713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.
    Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of lower lip position on the perceived attractiveness of chin prominence.
    Modarai F; Donaldson JC; Naini FB
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):795-800. PubMed ID: 23530543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions on the Harmony of the Human Face Profile.
    Perović T
    Med Sci Monit; 2017 Nov; 23():5589-5598. PubMed ID: 29170363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Lip Projection and Chin Position on Facial Profile Preferences Among Various Layers of Polish Population. Part 1.
    Adamek A; Sarul M; Lis J; Kobiela Z; Kiełczawa M; Semeniuk F
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2022; 14():253-263. PubMed ID: 36093269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the Acceptable Range of Lips and Chin Position in Two Different Geographical Zones of Iran among Laypersons.
    Golfeshan F; Nasseri Mojarad A; Sardarian AR
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2024 Jun; 25(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 38962081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.