These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1915000)
21. Genotoxicity assessment in aquatic environments under the influence of heavy metals and organic contaminants. Vargas VM; Migliavacca SB; de Melo AC; Horn RC; Guidobono RR; de Sá Ferreira IC; Pestana MH Mutat Res; 2001 Feb; 490(2):141-58. PubMed ID: 11342240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of surface water and wastewater effluents as determined by bioluminescence, umu-assays and selected biomarkers. Dizer H; Wittekindt E; Fischer B; Hansen PD Chemosphere; 2002 Jan; 46(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 11827279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? I. Reports of individual databases presented at an EURL ECVAM Workshop. Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Gooderham N; Kasper P; Lynch A; Morita T; Ouedraogo G; Parra Morte JM; Pfuhler S; Rogiers V; Schulz M; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; Worth A; Corvi R Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():55-68. PubMed ID: 25435356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detection of genotoxic substances in bivalve molluscs from the Saguenay Fjord (Canada), using the SOS chromotest. White PA; Blaise C; Rasmussen JB Mutat Res; 1997 Aug; 392(3):277-300. PubMed ID: 9294028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. SOS chromotest results in a broader context: empirical relationships between genotoxic potency, mutagenic potency, and carcinogenic potency. White PA; Rasmussen JB Environ Mol Mutagen; 1996; 27(4):270-305. PubMed ID: 8665872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Environmental exposure of pharmaceuticals and musk fragrances in the Somes River before and after upgrading the municipal wastewater treatment plant Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Moldovan Z; Chira R; Alder AC Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Aug; 16 Suppl 1():S46-54. PubMed ID: 18972147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the water genotoxicity from Santos Estuary (Brazil) in relation to the sediment contamination and effluent discharges. Umbuzeiro Gde A; Kummrow F; Roubicek DA; Tominaga MY Environ Int; 2006 Apr; 32(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 16216325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Industrial effluents and surface waters genotoxicity and mutagenicity evaluation of a river of Tucuman, Argentina. Gana JM; Ordóñez R; Zampini C; Hidalgo M; Meoni S; Isla MI J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jul; 155(3):403-6. PubMed ID: 18178309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction and resin adsorption for concentrating mutagens in Ames Salmonella/microsome assays on water. Grabow WO; Burger JS; Hilner CA Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1981 Oct; 27(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 7030434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pharmaceutical wastewater being composite mixture of environmental pollutants may be associated with mutagenicity and genotoxicity. Sharif A; Ashraf M; Anjum AA; Javeed A; Altaf I; Akhtar MF; Abbas M; Akhtar B; Saleem A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(3):2813-20. PubMed ID: 26452655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative study of the sensitivities of Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 to hospital waste waters. Gupta P; Mathur P; Mathur N; Aarya B Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 93(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 24718501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Strategies for decolorization and detoxification of pulp and paper mill effluent. Garg SK; Tripathi M Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011; 212():113-36. PubMed ID: 21432056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantification of umu genotoxicity level of urban river water. Kameya T; Nagato T; Nakagawa K; Yamashita D; Kobayashi T; Fujie K Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(3):410-5. PubMed ID: 21278461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genotoxicity of sludges, wastewater and effluents from three different industries. Krishnamurthi K; Saravana Devi S; Hengstler JG; Hermes M; Kumar K; Dutta D; Muhil Vannan S; Subin TS; Yadav RR; Chakrabarti T Arch Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 82(12):965-71. PubMed ID: 19002669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Genotoxicity evaluation of hospital wastewaters. Gupta P; Mathur N; Bhatnagar P; Nagar P; Srivastava S Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Oct; 72(7):1925-32. PubMed ID: 19524298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of industrial, hospital and domestic wastewater genotoxicity with the Salmonella fluctuation test and the SOS chromotest. Jolibois B; Guerbet M Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 565(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 15661613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Salmonella mutagenicity of industrial, surface and ground water samples of Aligarh region of India. Siddiqui AH; Ahmad M Mutat Res; 2003 Nov; 541(1-2):21-9. PubMed ID: 14568291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of toxicity, genotoxicity and environmental risk of simulated textile and tannery wastewaters with a battery of biotests. Tigini V; Giansanti P; Mangiavillano A; Pannocchia A; Varese GC Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 May; 74(4):866-73. PubMed ID: 21176963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Re-examination of the genotoxic activity of water taken from the Songhua River in P. R. China. Yu J; Dong HW; Shi LT; Jiang HL; Yu JW; Zhao QW; Cai SC; Han D; Tang XY; Liu JR Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2013 Jul; 65(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 23435683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Change of genotoxicity for raw and finished water: role of purification processes. Wang D; Xu Z; Zhao Y; Yan X; Shi J Chemosphere; 2011 Mar; 83(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 21315407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]