These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19150630)

  • 1. An automated system for measuring tip impedance and among-electrode shunting in high-electrode count microelectrode arrays.
    Gunalan K; Warren DJ; Perry JD; Normann RA; Clark GA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Apr; 178(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 19150630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new high-density (25 electrodes/mm²) penetrating microelectrode array for recording and stimulating sub-millimeter neuroanatomical structures.
    Wark HA; Sharma R; Mathews KS; Fernandez E; Yoo J; Christensen B; Tresco P; Rieth L; Solzbacher F; Normann RA; Tathireddy P
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Aug; 10(4):045003. PubMed ID: 23723133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling of the cell-electrode interface noise for microelectrode arrays.
    Guo J; Yuan J; Chan M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2012 Dec; 6(6):605-13. PubMed ID: 23853261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying long-term microelectrode array functionality using chronic in vivo impedance testing.
    Prasad A; Sanchez JC
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Apr; 9(2):026028. PubMed ID: 22442134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An automated system for rapid evaluation of high-density electrode arrays in neural prostheses.
    John SE; Shivdasani MN; Leuenberger J; Fallon JB; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Rathbone GD; Williams CE
    J Neural Eng; 2011 Jun; 8(3):036011. PubMed ID: 21493979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization and optimization of microelectrode arrays for in vivo nerve signal recording and stimulation.
    Blau A; Ziegler C; Heyer M; Endres F; Schwitzgebel G; Matthies T; Stieglitz T; Meyer JU; Göpel W
    Biosens Bioelectron; 1997; 12(9-10):883-92. PubMed ID: 9451781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
    Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open-source Toolkit: Benchtop Carbon Fiber Microelectrode Array for Nerve Recording.
    Richie JM; Patel PR; Welle EJ; Dong T; Chen L; Shih AJ; Chestek CA
    J Vis Exp; 2021 Oct; (176):. PubMed ID: 34779441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chronic impedance spectroscopy of an endovascular stent-electrode array.
    Opie NL; John SE; Rind GS; Ronayne SM; Grayden DB; Burkitt AN; May CN; O'Brien TJ; Oxley TJ
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Aug; 13(4):046020. PubMed ID: 27378157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nanostructuration strategies to enhance microelectrode array (MEA) performance for neuronal recording and stimulation.
    Heim M; Yvert B; Kuhn A
    J Physiol Paris; 2012; 106(3-4):137-45. PubMed ID: 22027264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rodent model for assessing the long term safety and performance of peripheral nerve recording electrodes.
    Vasudevan S; Patel K; Welle C
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Feb; 14(1):016008. PubMed ID: 27934777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The noise and impedance of microelectrodes.
    Mierzejewski M; Steins H; Kshirsagar P; Jones PD
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Oct; 17(5):052001. PubMed ID: 33055360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of microelectrode arrays for artificial retinal implants using liquid crystal polymers.
    Lee SW; Seo JM; Ha S; Kim ET; Chung H; Kim SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Dec; 50(12):5859-66. PubMed ID: 19553608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid evaluation of the durability of cortical neural implants using accelerated aging with reactive oxygen species.
    Takmakov P; Ruda K; Scott Phillips K; Isayeva IS; Krauthamer V; Welle CG
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Apr; 12(2):026003. PubMed ID: 25627426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical performance of penetrating microelectrodes chronically implanted in cat cortex.
    Kane SR; Cogan SF; Ehrlich J; Plante TD; McCreery DB; Troyk PR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Aug; 60(8):2153-60. PubMed ID: 23475329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated assembly of high-density carbon fiber electrode arrays for single unit electrophysiological recordings.
    Dong T; Chen L; Patel PR; Richie JM; Chestek CA; Shih AJ
    J Neural Eng; 2023 May; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 37141883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Data-driven model comparing the effects of glial scarring and interface interactions on chronic neural recordings in non-human primates.
    Malaga KA; Schroeder KE; Patel PR; Irwin ZT; Thompson DE; Nicole Bentley J; Lempka SF; Chestek CA; Patil PG
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016010. PubMed ID: 26655972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fabrication and characterization of polyimide-based 'smooth' titanium nitride microelectrode arrays for neural stimulation and recording.
    Rodrigues F; Ribeiro JF; Anacleto PA; Fouchard A; David O; Sarro PM; Mendes PM
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Dec; 17(1):016010. PubMed ID: 31614339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Active floating micro electrode arrays (AFMA).
    Kim T; Troyk PR; Bak M
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2807-10. PubMed ID: 17946982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impedance scaling for gold and platinum microelectrodes.
    Fan B; Wolfrum B; Robinson JT
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Sep; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 34433150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.