609 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19150643)
1. Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site.
Chipinda I; Anderson SE; Butterworth LF; Beezhold D; Siegel PD
Toxicology; 2009 Mar; 257(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 19150643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity.
Lappin MB; Dearman RJ; Norval M; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact and respiratory sensitizers can be identified by cytokine profiles following inhalation exposure.
De Jong WH; Arts JH; De Klerk A; Schijf MA; Ezendam J; Kuper CF; Van Loveren H
Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 261(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 19422874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of an ex vivo local lymph node assay to assess contact hypersensitivity potential.
Piccotti JR; Kawabata TT
J Immunotoxicol; 2008 Jul; 5(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 18830887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A draining lymph node assay (DLNA) for assessing the sensitizing potential of proteins.
Boverhof DR; Gollapudi BB; Hotchkiss JA; Osterloh-Quiroz M; Woolhiser MR
Toxicol Lett; 2010 Mar; 193(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 20060446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective modulation of B-cell activation markers CD86 and I-Ak on murine draining lymph node cells following allergen or irritant treatment.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Miller CM; Ridder GM
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1999 Sep; 159(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 10495778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.
Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the sensitization potential of persulfate salts used for bleaching hair.
Cruz MJ; De Vooght V; Muñoz X; Hoet PH; Morell F; Nemery B; Vanoirbeek JA
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 19207378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of irritancy and sensitization potential of metalworking fluid mixtures and components.
Anderson SE; Brown KK; Butterworth LF; Fedorowicz A; Jackson LG; Frasch HF; Beezhold D; Munson AE; Meade BJ
J Immunotoxicol; 2009 Mar; 6(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 19519159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reduced local lymph node assay: the impact of group size.
Ryan CA; Chaney JG; Kern PS; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA; Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF
J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 17879259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytokine production induced by low-molecular-weight chemicals as a function of the stimulation index in a modified local lymph node assay: an approach to discriminate contact sensitizers from respiratory sensitizers.
Van Och FM; Van Loveren H; De Jong WH; Vandebriel RJ
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2002 Oct; 184(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 12392968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The respiratory local lymph node assay as a tool to study respiratory sensitizers.
Arts JH; de Jong WH; van Triel JJ; Schijf MA; de Klerk A; van Loveren H; Kuper CF
Toxicol Sci; 2008 Dec; 106(2):423-34. PubMed ID: 18815142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of differential gene expression in auricular lymph nodes draining skin exposed to sensitizers and irritants.
Ku HO; Jeong SH; Kang HG; Pyo HM; Cho JH; Son SW; Ryu DY
Toxicol Lett; 2008 Feb; 177(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18242016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The respiratory allergen glutaraldehyde in the local lymph node assay: sensitization by skin exposure, but not by inhalation.
van Triel JJ; van Bree BW; Roberts DW; Muijser H; Duistermaat E; Woutersen RA; Kuper CF
Toxicology; 2011 Jan; 279(1-3):115-22. PubMed ID: 20933045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proliferative responses in the local lymph node assay associated with concomitant exposure to 1,4-phenylenediamine and methyldibromo glutaronitrile: evidence for synergy?
Jowsey IR; Basketter DA; Irwin A
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Aug; 59(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18759875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of methods to predict the respiratory sensitizing potential of chemicals: A study with a piperidinyl chlorotriazine derivative that caused an outbreak of occupational asthma.
Vanoirbeek JA; Mandervelt C; Cunningham AR; Hoet PH; Xu H; Vanhooren HM; Nemery B
Toxicol Sci; 2003 Dec; 76(2):338-46. PubMed ID: 14514965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
