607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19151280)
1. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.
Cannesson M; Musard H; Desebbe O; Boucau C; Simon R; Hénaine R; Lehot JJ
Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 19151280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
Cannesson M; Slieker J; Desebbe O; Bauer C; Chiari P; Hénaine R; Lehot JJ
Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1195-200, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
Cannesson M; Attof Y; Rosamel P; Desebbe O; Joseph P; Metton O; Bastien O; Lehot JJ
Anesthesiology; 2007 Jun; 106(6):1105-11. PubMed ID: 17525584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Mutoh T; Ishikawa T; Nishino K; Yasui N
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jul; 21(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19542999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardiography.
Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Roullet S; Quinart A; Revel P; Sztark F
Anesth Analg; 2009 Aug; 109(2):466-9. PubMed ID: 19608819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
Perner A; Faber T
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using respiratory variations in left ventricular stroke area by transoesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection in mechanically ventilated patients.
Cannesson M; Slieker J; Desebbe O; Farhat F; Bastien O; Lehot JJ
Crit Care; 2006; 10(6):R171. PubMed ID: 17163985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.
Auler JO; Galas F; Hajjar L; Santos L; Carvalho T; Michard F
Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1201-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery.
Rex S; Schälte G; Schroth S; de Waal EE; Metzelder S; Overbeck Y; Rossaint R; Buhre W
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Oct; 51(9):1258-67. PubMed ID: 17714575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Cottenceau V; Revel P; Sztark F
Br J Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 101(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 18852114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ability of pleth variability index to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia.
Desebbe O; Boucau C; Farhat F; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Anesth Analg; 2010 Mar; 110(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20185658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.
Shin YH; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Kim GS; Lee JH; Lee SK
Liver Transpl; 2011 Jan; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21254345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery.
Høiseth LØ; Hoff IE; Myre K; Landsverk SA; Kirkebøen KA
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Jul; 56(6):777-86. PubMed ID: 22288953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Yazigi A; Khoury E; Hlais S; Madi-Jebara S; Haddad F; Hayek G; Jabbour K
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Jun; 26(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 22100211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
