These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19151889)

  • 21. The user in the design process of an EPR.
    van der Meijden MJ; Tange HJ; Boiten J; Troost J; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():224-8. PubMed ID: 11187546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready?
    Dansky KH; Gamm LD; Vasey JJ; Barsukiewicz CK
    J Healthc Manag; 1999; 44(6):440-54; discussion 454-5. PubMed ID: 10662431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Norwegians GPs' use of electronic patient record systems.
    Christensen T; Faxvaag A; Loerum H; Grimsmo A
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Dec; 78(12):808-14. PubMed ID: 19828365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system.
    Sittig DF; Kuperman GJ; Fiskio J
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():400-4. PubMed ID: 10566389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Satisfaction with a computerized practitioner order-entry system at two military health care facilities.
    Wilson JP; Bulatao PT; Rascati KL
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2000 Dec; 57(23):2188-95. PubMed ID: 11127698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.
    Likourezos A; Chalfin DB; Murphy DG; Sommer B; Darcy K; Davidson SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 27(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 15498630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction.
    Top M; Gider O
    J Med Syst; 2012 Jun; 36(3):1979-88. PubMed ID: 21302133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attitudes toward inter-hospital electronic patient record exchange: discrepancies among physicians, medical record staff, and patients.
    Wang JY; Ho HY; Chen JD; Chai S; Tai CJ; Chen YF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Jul; 15():264. PubMed ID: 26162748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland.
    Hyppönen H; Reponen J; Lääveri T; Kaipio J
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jan; 83(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 24200753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians' clinical work practice.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 12925550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns.
    Lee F; Teich JM; Spurr CD; Bates DW
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1996; 3(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 8750389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The value of connected health information: perceptions of electronic health record users in Canada.
    Tharmalingam S; Hagens S; Zelmer J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():93. PubMed ID: 27422571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electronic health record usage behaviors in primary care medical practices: A survey of family physicians in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):857-67. PubMed ID: 26238705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Users' perspectives of key factors to implementing electronic health records in Canada: a Delphi study.
    McGinn CA; Gagnon MP; Shaw N; Sicotte C; Mathieu L; Leduc Y; Grenier S; Duplantie J; Abdeljelil AB; Légaré F
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Sep; 12():105. PubMed ID: 22967231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.
    Martikainen S; Korpela M; Tiihonen T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 24382475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of Electronic Health Record Implementation in Hospitals.
    Tubaishat A
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2017 Jul; 35(7):364-372. PubMed ID: 28221186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nurses' perceptions of and attitudes toward an electronic medical record system at Seoul National University Hospital.
    Ahn TS; Park IS; You OS; Shin HJ; Woo KS; Jo EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():851. PubMed ID: 17102423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Determinants of user satisfaction with a Clinical Information System.
    Palm JM; Colombet I; Sicotte C; Degoulet P
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():614-8. PubMed ID: 17238414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.
    Kaipio J; Kuusisto A; Hyppönen H; Heponiemi T; Lääveri T
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Feb; 134():104018. PubMed ID: 31835158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.