386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19152231)
1. Dose selection in seamless phase II/III clinical trials based on efficacy and safety.
Kimani PK; Stallard N; Hutton JL
Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(6):917-36. PubMed ID: 19152231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of methods for adaptive treatment selection.
Friede T; Stallard N
Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):767-81. PubMed ID: 18932136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Group-sequential methods for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials.
Stallard N
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):787-801. PubMed ID: 21516569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A seamless phase II/III design with sample-size re-estimation.
Bischoff W; Miller F
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 20183428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Drug Development Model: a case study in Bayesian clinical trial simulation.
Nixon RM; O'Hagan A; Oakley J; Madan J; Stevens JW; Bansback N; Brennan A
Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):371-89. PubMed ID: 19340851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Seamless Phase II/III combination study through response adaptive randomization.
Wang L; Cui L
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1177-87. PubMed ID: 18027224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the outcome of phase III trials using phase II data: a case study of clinical trial simulation in late stage drug development.
De Ridder F
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 15733220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An alternative phase II/III design for continuous endpoints.
Huang WS; Liu JP; Hsiao CF
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 20186724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical guidelines for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials that use Bayesian methods.
Kimani PK; Glimm E; Maurer W; Hutton JL; Stallard N
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2068-85. PubMed ID: 22437262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Targeting population entering phase III trials: a new stratified adaptive phase II design.
Tournoux-Facon C; De Rycke Y; Tubert-Bitter P
Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):801-11. PubMed ID: 21432875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A phased approach to clinical testing: criteria for progressing from Phase I to Phase II to Phase III studies.
André FE; Foulkes MA
Dev Biol Stand; 1998; 95():57-60. PubMed ID: 9855414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trial design incorporating short-term endpoint information.
Stallard N
Stat Med; 2010 Apr; 29(9):959-71. PubMed ID: 20191605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-stage design for dose-finding that accounts for both efficacy and safety.
Dragalin V; Fedorov VV; Wu Y
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5156-76. PubMed ID: 18680164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An adaptive group sequential design for phase II/III clinical trials that select a single treatment from several.
Kelly PJ; Stallard N; Todd S
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):641-58. PubMed ID: 16022169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of predictive probabilities in phase II and phase III clinical trials.
Johns D; Andersen JS
J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Mar; 9(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 10091910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A group-sequential design for clinical trials with treatment selection.
Stallard N; Friede T
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6209-27. PubMed ID: 18792085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seamless phase II/III designs.
Stallard N; Todd S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Dec; 20(6):623-34. PubMed ID: 20724313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts.
Bretz F; Schmidli H; König F; Racine A; Maurer W
Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):623-34. PubMed ID: 16972714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Designs for phase II trials allowing for a trade-off between response and toxicity.
Conaway MR; Petroni GR
Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1375-86. PubMed ID: 8962459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
