These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19152544)
21. The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence. Greenspan R; Scurich N Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):650-659. PubMed ID: 27149289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications. Clark SE; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review. Slane CR; Dodson CS Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Appearance-change instruction effects on eyewitness lineup identification accuracy are not moderated by amount of appearance change. Molinaro PF; Arndorfer A; Charman SD Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 23855325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt. Price HL; Bruer KC; Adkins MC Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Suspect confession of child sexual abuse to investigators. Lippert T; Cross TP; Jones L; Walsh W Child Maltreat; 2010 May; 15(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 20410024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: on the dangers of presuming guilt. Kassin SM; Goldstein CC; Savitsky K Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 12733421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration. Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm. Charman SD; Wells GL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy. Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]