207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19152685)
1. Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of two porcine tissues using high-throughput technologies.
Hornshøj H; Bendixen E; Conley LN; Andersen PK; Hedegaard J; Panitz F; Bendixen C
BMC Genomics; 2009 Jan; 10():30. PubMed ID: 19152685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of microarray and MPSS technology platforms for expression analysis of Arabidopsis.
Chen J; Agrawal V; Rattray M; West MA; St Clair DA; Michelmore RW; Coughlan SJ; Meyers BC
BMC Genomics; 2007 Nov; 8():414. PubMed ID: 17997849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of oligonucleotide-microarray and serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) in transcript profiling analysis of megakaryocytes derived from CD34+ cells.
Kim HL
Exp Mol Med; 2003 Oct; 35(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 14646601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel breast cancer biomarkers identified by integrative proteomic and gene expression mapping.
Ou K; Yu K; Kesuma D; Hooi M; Huang N; Chen W; Lee SY; Goh XP; Tan LK; Liu J; Soon SY; Bin Abdul Rashid S; Putti TC; Jikuya H; Ichikawa T; Nishimura O; Salto-Tellez M; Tan P
J Proteome Res; 2008 Apr; 7(4):1518-28. PubMed ID: 18318472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GO-Diff: mining functional differentiation between EST-based transcriptomes.
Chen Z; Wang W; Ling XB; Liu JJ; Chen L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():72. PubMed ID: 16480524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of proteome and transcriptome variation in mouse.
Ghazalpour A; Bennett B; Petyuk VA; Orozco L; Hagopian R; Mungrue IN; Farber CR; Sinsheimer J; Kang HM; Furlotte N; Park CC; Wen PZ; Brewer H; Weitz K; Camp DG; Pan C; Yordanova R; Neuhaus I; Tilford C; Siemers N; Gargalovic P; Eskin E; Kirchgessner T; Smith DJ; Smith RD; Lusis AJ
PLoS Genet; 2011 Jun; 7(6):e1001393. PubMed ID: 21695224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentially profiling the low-expression transcriptomes of human hepatoma using a novel SSH/microarray approach.
Pan YS; Lee YS; Lee YL; Lee WC; Hsieh SY
BMC Genomics; 2006 May; 7():131. PubMed ID: 16737534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seedless mutant 'Wuzi Ougan' (Citrus suavissima Hort. ex Tanaka 'seedless') and the wild type were compared by iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics and integratedly analyzed with transcriptome to improve understanding of male sterility.
Zhang C; Yu D; Ke F; Zhu M; Xu J; Zhang M
BMC Genet; 2018 Nov; 19(1):106. PubMed ID: 30458706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An approach to handling and interpretation of ambiguous data in transcriptome and proteome comparisons.
Irmler M; Hartl D; Schmidt T; Schuchhardt J; Lach C; Meyer HE; Hrabé de Angelis M; Klose J; Beckers J
Proteomics; 2008 Mar; 8(6):1165-9. PubMed ID: 18283664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of cDNA microarray data by multiple clones mapping to the same transcript.
Wang D; Wang C; Zhang L; Xiao H; Shen X; Ren L; Zhao W; Hong G; Zhang Y; Zhu J; Zhang M; Yang D; Ma W; Guo Z
OMICS; 2009 Dec; 13(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 19715395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parallel deep transcriptome and proteome analysis of zebrafish larvae.
Palmblad M; Henkel CV; Dirks RP; Meijer AH; Deelder AM; Spaink HP
BMC Res Notes; 2013 Oct; 6():428. PubMed ID: 24156766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tribolium castaneum larval gut transcriptome and proteome: A resource for the study of the coleopteran gut.
Morris K; Lorenzen MD; Hiromasa Y; Tomich JM; Oppert C; Elpidina EN; Vinokurov K; Jurat-Fuentes JL; Fabrick J; Oppert B
J Proteome Res; 2009 Aug; 8(8):3889-98. PubMed ID: 19545177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a porcine skeletal muscle cDNA microarray: analysis of differential transcript expression in phenotypically distinct muscles.
Bai Q; McGillivray C; da Costa N; Dornan S; Evans G; Stear MJ; Chang KC
BMC Genomics; 2003 Mar; 4(1):8. PubMed ID: 12611633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of hybridization-based and sequencing-based gene expression technologies on biological replicates.
Liu F; Jenssen TK; Trimarchi J; Punzo C; Cepko CL; Ohno-Machado L; Hovig E; Kuo WP
BMC Genomics; 2007 Jun; 8():153. PubMed ID: 17555589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of transcript profiling on Arabidopsis microarray platform technologies.
Pylatuik JD; Fobert PR
Plant Mol Biol; 2005 Jul; 58(5):609-24. PubMed ID: 16158238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A rapid method for computationally inferring transcriptome coverage and microarray sensitivity.
Reverter A; McWilliam SM; Barris W; Dalrymple BP
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 15308544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcriptome and proteome profiling to understanding the biology of high productivity CHO cells.
Nissom PM; Sanny A; Kok YJ; Hiang YT; Chuah SH; Shing TK; Lee YY; Wong KT; Hu WS; Sim MY; Philp R
Mol Biotechnol; 2006 Oct; 34(2):125-40. PubMed ID: 17172658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Transcriptomes for serial analysis of gene expression].
Marti J; Piquemal D; Manchon L; Commes T
J Soc Biol; 2002; 196(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 12645300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proteomes and transcriptomes of the Apicomplexa--where's the message?
Wastling JM; Xia D; Sohal A; Chaussepied M; Pain A; Langsley G
Int J Parasitol; 2009 Jan; 39(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 18996390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transcriptomic identification of candidate genes involved in sunflower responses to chilling and salt stresses based on cDNA microarray analysis.
Fernandez P; Di Rienzo J; Fernandez L; Hopp HE; Paniego N; Heinz RA
BMC Plant Biol; 2008 Jan; 8():11. PubMed ID: 18221554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
