BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19152949)

  • 1. Development of a scoring system from noncontrast computerized tomography measurements to improve the selection of upper ureteral stone for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Ng CF; Siu DY; Wong A; Goggins W; Chan ES; Wong KT
    J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1151-7. PubMed ID: 19152949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
    Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
    BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone.
    Niwa N; Matsumoto K; Miyahara M; Omura M; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Miyata K; Oya M
    World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1455-1461. PubMed ID: 28220189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?
    Xun Y; Li J; Geng Y; Liu Z; Yu X; Wang X; Xiao F; Li Z; Li C; Wang S
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():84-89. PubMed ID: 30292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Nguyen DP; Hnilicka S; Kiss B; Seiler R; Thalmann GN; Roth B
    J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 25661296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.
    Torricelli FC; Marchini GS; Yamauchi FI; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Srougi M; Monga M; Mazzucchi E
    J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2002-7. PubMed ID: 25524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
    Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on noncontrast helical computed tomography as predictor of fragility by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Yoshida S; Hayashi T; Ikeda J; Yoshinaga A; Ohno R; Ishii N; Okada T; Osada H; Honda N; Yamada T
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 16806419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.
    Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Chung DY; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
    Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Nov; 57(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 27847914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
    Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Algorithm for Assessing Stone-Free Status after Single Session Shock Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones.
    Choo MS; Uhmn S; Kim JK; Han JH; Kim DH; Kim J; Lee SH
    J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1371-1377. PubMed ID: 30036513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kanao K; Nakashima J; Nakagawa K; Asakura H; Miyajima A; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Murai M
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. PubMed ID: 16952658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
    Lim KH; Jung JH; Kwon JH; Lee YS; Bae J; Cho MC; Lee KS; Lee HW
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25598937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic parameters on noncontrast computerized tomography predictive of shock wave lithotripsy success.
    Kacker R; Zhao L; Macejko A; Thaxton CS; Stern J; Liu JJ; Nadler RB
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1866-71. PubMed ID: 18353389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
    Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors.
    Yazici O; Tuncer M; Sahin C; Demirkol MK; Kafkasli A; Sarica K
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26401859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Pareek G; Armenakas NA; Fracchia JA
    J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1679-81. PubMed ID: 12686807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.
    Langenauer J; Betschart P; Hechelhammer L; Güsewell S; Schmid HP; Engeler DS; Abt D; Zumstein V
    World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2073-2080. PubMed ID: 29845319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography.
    Perks AE; Gotto G; Teichman JM
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):912-5. PubMed ID: 17632139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of the supine transgluteal approach for distal ureteral stone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: outcomes based on CT characteristics.
    Galli R; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Martorana E; Rosa M; Mofferdin A; Bianchi G
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Apr; 69(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 27768022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.