260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19152949)
21. Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment.
Pace KT; Weir MJ; Tariq N; Honey RJ
J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1905-7. PubMed ID: 11061877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Noncontrast computed tomography can predict the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy via accurate stone measurement and abdominal fat distribution determination.
Geng JH; Tu HP; Shih PM; Shen JT; Jang MY; Wu WJ; Li CC; Chou YH; Juan YS
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 31(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25600918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preoperative stone attenuation value predicts success after shock wave lithotripsy in children.
McAdams S; Kim N; Dajusta D; Monga M; Ravish IR; Nerli R; Baker L; Shukla AR
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4 Suppl):1804-9. PubMed ID: 20728112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones.
Honey RJ; Schuler TD; Ghiculete D; Pace KT;
J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1418-23. PubMed ID: 19683303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can we improve the prediction of stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? A neural network or a statistical model?
Gomha MA; Sheir KZ; Showky S; Abdel-Khalek M; Mokhtar AA; Madbouly K
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 15201765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large ureteral stones using HM3 lithotriptor.
Halachmi S; Nagar M; Golan S; Ginesin Y; Meretyk S
J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1449-52; discussion 1452. PubMed ID: 16952655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases.
Yamashita S; Iwahashi Y; Deguchi R; Kikkawa K; Kohjimoto Y; Hara I
Urolithiasis; 2020 Dec; 48(6):547-552. PubMed ID: 31993690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.
El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Mansour O; Sheir KZ
Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1688-93; discussion 1693-4. PubMed ID: 17161522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.
Akkaş F; Culha MG; Ayten A; Danacıoğlu YO; Yildiz Ö; İnci E; Guner E; Şahin S
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 46(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 35184987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition.
Nakasato T; Morita J; Ogawa Y
Urolithiasis; 2015 Feb; 43(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 25139151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A simple position to provide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar.
Tansu N; Obek C; Onal B; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V
Eur Urol; 2004 Mar; 45(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 15036682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. External Validation of Triple D Score in an Elderly (≥65 Years) Population for Prediction of Success Following Shockwave Lithotripsy.
Gökce MI; Esen B; Gülpınar B; Süer E; Gülpınar Ö
J Endourol; 2016 Sep; 30(9):1009-16. PubMed ID: 27392789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.
Perks AE; Schuler TD; Lee J; Ghiculete D; Chung DG; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 18674803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy.
Lopes Neto AC; Korkes F; Silva JL; Amarante RD; Mattos MH; Tobias-Machado M; Pompeo AC
J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):164-8. PubMed ID: 22100003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.
Lee JY; Kim JH; Kang DH; Chung DY; Lee DH; Do Jung H; Kwon JK; Cho KS
Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():23988. PubMed ID: 27035621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones.
Park HS; Gong MK; Yoon CY; Moon du G; Cheon J; Choi YD
J Endourol; 2016 Jul; 30(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 27042952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy.
Lee HY; Yang YH; Lee YL; Shen JT; Jang MY; Shih PM; Wu WJ; Chou YH; Juan YS
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 25975631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Shockwave Lithotripsy Is an Efficacious Treatment Modality for Obese Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi: Logistic Regression and Matched-Pair Analyses from a Dedicated Center Comparing Treatment Outcomes by Skin-to-Stone Distance.
Mains EAA; Blackmur JP; Sharma AD; Gietzmann WK; El-Mokadem I; Stephenson C; Wallace S; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2020 Apr; 34(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 32030994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Bandi G; Meiners RJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nakada SY
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 19007365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
