These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19153183)

  • 1. Evaluation of image quality in portal imaging using a combination of a storage phosphor plate and diagnostic cassette.
    Fujita H; Yamaguchi M; Fujioka T; Fukuda H; Murase K
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):504-8. PubMed ID: 19153183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
    Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification imaging using a computed radiography system for high-energy electron beam therapy.
    Fujita H; Yamaguchi M; Katsuda T; Sakamoto H; Fujioka T; Tada T; Azuma M
    Radiat Med; 2005 Dec; 23(8):550-6. PubMed ID: 16555563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-beam imaging for online verification of radiotherapy field placement.
    Jaffray DA; Chawla K; Yu C; Wong JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 7493852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography. The hybrid cassette revisited.
    Wilson AJ; West OC
    Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 8496033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing the weight of the EC-L cassette.
    Munro P; Mulligan M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):290-9. PubMed ID: 12183003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the edge enhancement effect of phase contrast imaging using newly-developed photostimulable phosphor plate].
    Matsuo S; Morishita J; Katafuchi T; Fujita H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 22687901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Depiction of low-contrast detail in digital radiography: comparison of powder- and needle-structured storage phosphor systems.
    Körner M; Treitl M; Schaetzing R; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M; Wirth S
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Jul; 41(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 16772853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
    Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a cassette-screen-film combination for radiation therapy portal localization imaging with improved contrast.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE; Huff KE; Monte S; Schlager BA; Atanas M; Matloubieh A
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1605-8. PubMed ID: 9350713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
    Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed radiography: photostimulable phosphor image plate technology.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2587727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital storage phosphor radiography for treatment verification in radiotherapy.
    Scheck RJ; Wendt T; Panzer M
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Sep; 66(789):801-6. PubMed ID: 8220952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.