BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

637 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19153971)

  • 1. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results.
    Oleszczuk A; Köhler C; Paulick J; Schneider A; Lanowska M
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19153971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
    Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer.
    Renaud MC; Plante M; Roy M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11006032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
    Sert B; Abeler V
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
    Pellegrino A; Vizza E; Fruscio R; Villa A; Corrado G; Villa M; Dell'Anna T; Vitobello D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in female patients: technique with preservation of the uterus and vagina.
    Menon M; Hemal AK; Tewari A; Shrivastava A; Shoma AM; Abol-Ein H; Ghoneim MA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Mar; 198(3):386-93. PubMed ID: 14992741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma.
    Fastrez M; Vandromme J; George P; Rozenberg S; Degueldre M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 19786318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.
    Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility, morbidity, and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: our experience.
    Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Vicario V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 17848319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymph node excision--initial experiences and development of a technique].
    Schneider A; Krause N; Kühne-Heid R; Kamprath S; Endisch U; Merker A; Nöschel H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(9):498-504. PubMed ID: 8992817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic radical hysterectomy: Technical aspects.
    Magrina JF; Kho R; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19176237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A fertility-preserving option in early cervical carcinoma: laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang D; Liang Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jan; 136(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 17137704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our early experience.
    Vasilescu C; Sgarbură O; Tudor S; Popa M; Turcanu A; Florescu A; Herlea V; Anghel R
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19886045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.