These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19154272)

  • 1. Bone density at interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Chun YS; Lim WH
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 19154272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Lim JE; Lee SJ; Kim YJ; Lim WH; Chun YS
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov; 12(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19840282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interdental gingiva, a visible guide for placement of mini-implants.
    Chun YS; Lee SK; Wikesjö UM; Lim WH
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 19154271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim SH; Yoon HG; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Ono A; Motoyoshi M; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 37(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 18295454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible.
    Park HS; Lee YJ; Jeong SH; Kwon TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18174068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Monnerat C; Restle L; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
    Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants.
    Choi JH; Park CH; Yi SW; Lim HJ; Hwang HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):766.e1-12; discussion 766-7. PubMed ID: 19962594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults.
    Baumgaertel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 22133945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Lim WH; Lee SK; Wikesjö UM; Chun YS
    Clin Anat; 2007 Oct; 20(7):760-5. PubMed ID: 17584877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!
    Romano FL; Consolaro A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25741821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement.
    Sawada K; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Ide Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients.
    Samrit V; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Seith A; Malhotra V
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 23304969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement.
    Baumgaertel S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 19651353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.
    Ozdemir F; Tozlu M; Germec-Cakan D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23374925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
    Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.