360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19154273)
21. Reproducibility and reliability of three-dimensional soft tissue landmark identification using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry.
Baysal A; Sahan AO; Ozturk MA; Uysal T
Angle Orthod; 2016 Nov; 86(6):1004-1009. PubMed ID: 27023408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reliability of a face scanner in measuring the vertical dimension of occlusion.
Srinivasan M; Berisha F; Bronzino I; Kamnoedboon P; Leles CR
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105016. PubMed ID: 38679136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Inter- and Intra-Operator Reliability of Facial and Dental Measurements Using 3D-Stereophotogrammetry.
Ceinos R; Tardivo D; Bertrand MF; Lupi-Pegurier L
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 May; 28(3):178-89. PubMed ID: 26887926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implementing a superimposition and measurement model for 3D sagittal analysis of therapy-induced changes in facial soft tissue: a pilot study.
Hoefert CS; Bacher M; Herberts T; Krimmel M; Reinert S; Hoefert S; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2010 May; 71(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 20503004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The assessment of facial variation in 4747 British school children.
Toma AM; Zhurov AI; Playle R; Marshall D; Rosin PL; Richmond S
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):655-64. PubMed ID: 21934112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The reproducibility of landmarks on three-dimensional images of 4- to 6-year-old children.
Berneburg M; Schubert C; von Einem C; Schaupp E; Möller M; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Jul; 71(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 20676812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-dimensional gender differences in facial form of children in the North East of England.
Bugaighis I; Mattick CR; Tiddeman B; Hobson R
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 21531786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional facial anthropometry using a laser surface scanner: validation of the technique.
Bush K; Antonyshyn O
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Aug; 98(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 8764710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of a three-dimensional facial scanning system based on structured light techniques.
Ma L; Xu T; Lin J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jun; 94(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 19303659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laser scanning for the identification of repeatable landmarks of the ears and face.
Coward TJ; Watson RM; Scott BJ
Br J Plast Surg; 1997 Jul; 50(5):308-14. PubMed ID: 9245863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dispersion assessment in the location of facial landmarks on photographs.
Campomanes-Álvarez BR; Ibáñez O; Navarro F; Alemán I; Cordón O; Damas S
Int J Legal Med; 2015 Jan; 129(1):227-36. PubMed ID: 24878615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of asthma on face shape: a three-dimensional study.
Al Ali A; Richmond S; Popat H; Toma AM; Playle R; Zhurov AI; Marshall D; Rosin PL; Henderson J
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 25074563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The 3-dimensional construction of the average 11-year-old child face: a clinical evaluation and application.
Kau CH; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Bibb R; Sugar A; Knox J; Hartles F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1086-92. PubMed ID: 16781342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The occlusal plane in the facial context: inter-operator repeatability of a new three-dimensional method.
Rosati R; Rossetti A; De Menezes M; Ferrario VF; Sforza C
Int J Oral Sci; 2012 Mar; 4(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 22241375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The feasibility of measuring three-dimensional facial morphology in children.
Kau CH; Zhurov A; Scheer R; Bouwman S; Richmond S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2004 Nov; 7(4):198-204. PubMed ID: 15562582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method.
Hajeer MY; Ayoub AF; Millett DT; Bock M; Siebert JP
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):318-30. PubMed ID: 12593004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system.
Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B
Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
