These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19154469)

  • 1. The 'buoy' stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model.
    Krebs A; Deane LA; Borin JF; Edwards RA; Sala LG; Khan F; Abdelshehid C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19154469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable ureteral stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model.
    Olweny EO; Landman J; Andreoni C; Collyer W; Kerbl K; Onciu M; Välimaa T; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2198-202. PubMed ID: 11956478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent.
    Lumiaho J; Heino A; Aaltomaa S; Välimaa T; Talja M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 21222571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel dual-lumen ureteral stents provide better ureteral flow than single ureteral stent in ex vivo porcine kidney model of extrinsic ureteral obstruction.
    Hafron J; Ost MC; Tan BJ; Fogarty JD; Hoenig DM; Lee BR; Smith AD
    Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 17070391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pilot study evaluating ureteric physiological changes with a novel 'ribbon stent' design using electromyographic and giant magnetoresistive sensors.
    Natalin RA; Hruby GW; Okhunov Z; Singh H; Phillips CK; Humphrey PA; Gupta M; Landman J
    BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(8):1128-31. PubMed ID: 19040534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metallic ureteral stents versus endoureterotomy as a therapeutic approach for experimental ureteral stricture.
    Soria F; Sun F; Durán E; Sánchez FM; Usón J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):521-9. PubMed ID: 15802452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Next generation biodegradable ureteral stent in a yucatan pig model.
    Chew BH; Lange D; Paterson RF; Hendlin K; Monga M; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):765-71. PubMed ID: 20022028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Placement of double-J ureteric stent using the pull-through technique in patients with tight ureteric stenosis.
    Kim BM; Park SI
    Abdom Imaging; 2008; 33(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 17440767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow characteristics of 3 unique ureteral stents: investigation of a Poiseuille flow pattern.
    Olweny EO; Portis AJ; Afane JS; Brewer AV; Shalhav AL; Luszczynski K; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):2099-103. PubMed ID: 11061935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-length or 24 cm ureteric stent? A multicentre randomised comparison of stent-related symptoms using a validated questionnaire.
    Calvert RC; Wong KY; Chitale SV; Irving SO; Nagarajan M; Biyani CS; Browning AJ; Young JG; Timoney AG; Keeley FX; Burgess NA
    BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1099-104. PubMed ID: 22882647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ureteric stents in pyeloplasty: a help or a hindrance?
    Elmalik K; Chowdhury MM; Capps SN
    J Pediatr Urol; 2008 Aug; 4(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 18644529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Improvement of quality of life of patients with internal stents by changing the shape of the stents].
    Martov AG; Ergakov DV; Kornienko SI; Aboian IA; Pavlov SV; Asfandiiarov FR; Kalashnikov ES
    Urologiia; 2011; (2):7-13. PubMed ID: 21815451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infective complications associated with ureteral stents in renal transplant recipients.
    Ranganathan M; Akbar M; Ilham MA; Chavez R; Kumar N; Asderakis A
    Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(1):162-4. PubMed ID: 19249503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vivo evaluation of a novel spiral cut flexible ureteral stent.
    Mucksavage P; Pick D; Haydel D; Etafy M; Kerbl DC; Lee JY; Ortiz-Vanderdys C; Saleh F; Olamendi S; Louie MK; McDougall EM
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):733-7. PubMed ID: 22386429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized single-blind comparison of ureteral stents composed of firm and soft polymer.
    Joshi HB; Chitale SV; Nagarajan M; Irving SO; Browning AJ; Biyani CS; Burgess NA
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2303-6. PubMed ID: 16280829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of transplant ureteral stricture with Acucise endoureterotomy: case report and literature review.
    Hsiao HL; Li CC; Chang TH; Wu WJ; Chou YH; Shen JT; Jang MY; Huang CH
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2007 May; 23(5):259-64. PubMed ID: 17525009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flow dynamics in a stented ureter.
    Siggers JH; Waters S; Wattis J; Cummings L
    Math Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 26(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 18990681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of a novel degradable ureteral stent in a porcine model.
    Hadaschik BA; Paterson RF; Fazli L; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Chew BH
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1161-6. PubMed ID: 18639278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Triclosan loaded ureteral stents decrease proteus mirabilis 296 infection in a rabbit urinary tract infection model.
    Cadieux PA; Chew BH; Knudsen BE; Dejong K; Rowe E; Reid G; Denstedt JD
    J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):2331-5. PubMed ID: 16697868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of symptoms and patients' comfort for JJ-ureteral stents with and without antireflux-membrane valve.
    Ecke TH; Bartel P; Hallmann S; Ruttloff J
    Urology; 2010 Jan; 75(1):212-6. PubMed ID: 19819529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.