BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19154532)

  • 1. The significance of second lumbrical-interosseous latency comparison in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Argyriou AA; Karanasios P; Makridou A; Makris N
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2009 Sep; 120(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19154532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of sensitivity of transcarpal median motor conduction velocity and conventional conduction techniques in electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Chang MH; Liu LH; Lee YC; Wei SJ; Chiang HL; Hsieh PF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 117(5):984-91. PubMed ID: 16551510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Second lumbrical and interossei latency difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
    Meena AK; Srinivasa Rao B; Sailaja S; Mallikarjuna M; Borgohain R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2789-94. PubMed ID: 18986835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can studies of the second lumbrical interossei and its premotor potential reduce the number of tests for carpal tunnel syndrome?
    Therimadasamy AK; Li E; Wilder-Smith EP
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Oct; 36(4):491-6. PubMed ID: 17654555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The value of motor latency difference measurements between the second lumbrical muscle and second interosseous muscle in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome].
    Banach M; Słowik A; Szczudlik A
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2002; 36(4):657-67. PubMed ID: 12418132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new median motor test: comparison with conventional motor studies in carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Pardal-Fernández JM; Vega-González G; Rodríguez-Vázquez M; Iniesta-López I
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Feb; 29(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 22353991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison of digit 1 with wrist and distoproximal ratio.
    Sharma KR; Rotta F; Romano J; Ayyar DR
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2001; 2001(2):2-10. PubMed ID: 12396863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A sensitive new median-ulnar technique for diagnosing mild Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
    Bodofsky EB; Wu KD; Campellone JV; Greenberg WM; Tomaio AC
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2005; 45(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 15981684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Correlations between the lumbrical-interosseous latency comparison test and standard tests used in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome].
    Banach M; Juranek J; Stanisz A
    Przegl Lek; 2015; 72(6):282-5. PubMed ID: 26817334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The second lumbrical-interosseous latency comparison in carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Ozben S; Acar H; Gunaydin S; Genc F; Ozer F; Ozben H
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 29(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 22659722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Electrophysiological diagnosis of severe carpal tunnel syndrome in patients on maintenance hemodialysis with created arterio-venous fistula and concomitant polyneuropathy].
    Banach M; Kopeć J; Sułowicz W
    Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 20687372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time course and predictors of median nerve conduction after carpal tunnel release.
    Rotman MB; Enkvetchakul BV; Megerian JT; Gozani SN
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 May; 29(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 15140473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of second lumbrical and interosseus latencies with standard measures of median nerve function across the carpal tunnel: a prospective study of 450 hands.
    Löscher WN; Auer-Grumbach M; Trinka E; Ladurner G; Hartung HP
    J Neurol; 2000 Jul; 247(7):530-4. PubMed ID: 10993495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic properties of nerve conduction tests in population-based carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Atroshi I; Gummesson C; Johnsson R; Ornstein E
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2003 May; 4():9. PubMed ID: 12734018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of provocative tests on electrodiagnosis criteria in clinical carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Emad MR; Najafi SH; Sepehrian MH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Dec; 19(6):1061-3. PubMed ID: 19679494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbrical-interosseous latency comparison in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Sheean GL; Houser MK; Murray NM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Dec; 97(6):285-9. PubMed ID: 8536577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dilemma of ulnar nerve entrapment at wrist in carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Moghtaderi A; Ghafarpoor M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2009 Feb; 111(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 19084328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The median palmar cutaneous nerve in normal subjects and CTS.
    Rathakrishnan R; Therimadasamy AK; Chan YH; Wilder-Smith EP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):776-80. PubMed ID: 17307392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of three median-to-ulnar comparative tests in diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Uncini A; Di Muzio A; Awad J; Manente G; Tafuro M; Gambi D
    Muscle Nerve; 1993 Dec; 16(12):1366-73. PubMed ID: 8232394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lumbrical and interossei recording in carpal tunnel syndrome.
    Preston DC; Logigian EL
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 Nov; 15(11):1253-7. PubMed ID: 1488062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.