These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19154753)

  • 1. Non-canonical reading: reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle (2008).
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1916-8. PubMed ID: 19154753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using reinforcement learning to understand the emergence of "intelligent" eye-movement behavior during reading.
    Reichle ED; Laurent PA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Apr; 113(2):390-408. PubMed ID: 16637766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model.
    Reichle ED; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    Vision Res; 1999 Oct; 39(26):4403-11. PubMed ID: 10789433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-line contextual influences during reading normal text: a multiple-regression analysis.
    Pynte J; New B; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2172-83. PubMed ID: 18701125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On-line contextual influences during reading normal text: The role of nouns, verbs and adjectives.
    Pynte J; New B; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 19166870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check.
    Reichle ED; Tokowicz N; Liu Y; Perfetti CA
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jul; 48(7):993-1003. PubMed ID: 21261631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a).
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1490-5. PubMed ID: 17154788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reprint of "Non-canonical reading: Reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle" [Vision Research 49/14 (2008) 1916-1918].
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2009 Aug; 49(17):2237-9. PubMed ID: 19671460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eye movements and reading.
    O'Regan JK
    Rev Oculomot Res; 1990; 4():395-453. PubMed ID: 7492534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention to one word at a time in reading is still a viable hypothesis: rejoinder to Inhoff, Radach, and Eiter (2006).
    Pollatsek A; Reichle ED; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1496-500. PubMed ID: 17154789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The consequences of violations to reading order: an eye movement analysis.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2309-20. PubMed ID: 18680761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reading with and without eye movements: reply to Just, Carpenter, and Woolley.
    Ward NJ; Juola JF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1982 Jun; 111(2):239-41. PubMed ID: 6213736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibitory neighbor priming effects in eye movements during reading.
    Paterson KB; Liversedge SP; Davis CJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19145008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using reinforcement learning to examine dynamic attention allocation during reading.
    Liu Y; Reichle ED; Gao DG
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(8):1507-40. PubMed ID: 23432659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.
    Reichle ED; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    Behav Brain Sci; 2003 Aug; 26(4):445-76; discussion 477-526. PubMed ID: 15067951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Space information is important for reading.
    Perea M; Acha J
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(15):1994-2000. PubMed ID: 19463847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.
    Reichle ED; Warren T; McConnell K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19145006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on.
    Rayner K; Pollatsek A; Liversedge SP; Reichle ED
    Vision Res; 2009 Aug; 49(17):2232-6. PubMed ID: 19000705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple summation rule for optimal fixation selection in visual search.
    Najemnik J; Geisler WS
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1286-94. PubMed ID: 19138697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.