These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19155408)
1. Interobserver variability of transrectal ultrasound for prostate volume measurement according to volume and observer experience. Choi YJ; Kim JK; Kim HJ; Cho KS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 19155408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of prostatic volume with transrectal ultrasound: A study of intra-observer and interobserver variation. Bates TS; Reynard JM; Peters TJ; Gingell JC J Urol; 1996 Apr; 155(4):1299-300. PubMed ID: 8632559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter- and intra-observer variability in prostate definition with tissue harmonic and brightness mode imaging. Sandhu GK; Dunscombe P; Meyer T; Pavamani S; Khan R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jan; 82(1):e9-16. PubMed ID: 21489703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of interobserver variability on transrectal ultrasonography-based postimplant dosimetry. Xue J; Waterman F; Handler J; Gressen E Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 16864069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility and observer variability of transrectal ultrasound measurements of prostatic volume. Collins GN; Raab GM; Hehir M; King B; Garraway WM Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(9):1101-5. PubMed ID: 8849824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of suprapubic and transrectal measurements in assessment of prostate dimensions and volume: is transrectal ultrasonography really necessary for prostate measurements? Ozden E; Göğüş C; Kiliç O; Yaman O; Ozdiler E Urol J; 2009; 6(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 19711277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate volume contouring: a 3D analysis of segmentation using 3DTRUS, CT, and MR. Smith WL; Lewis C; Bauman G; Rodrigues G; D'Souza D; Ash R; Ho D; Venkatesan V; Downey D; Fenster A Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(4):1238-47. PubMed ID: 17336224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size. Rodriguez E; Skarecky D; Narula N; Ahlering TE J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups. Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra- and inter-observer variability and reliability of prostate volume measurement via two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Tong S; Cardinal HN; McLoughlin RF; Downey DB; Fenster A Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 24(5):673-81. PubMed ID: 9695270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasonography for use in a brachytherapy program. Chenven ES; Glazier DB; Krisch EB; Diamond SM; Marmar JL Urology; 2001 Nov; 58(5):752-5. PubMed ID: 11711354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of prostate and transition zone volume measured by the ellipsoid and planimetric methods with transrectal ultrasonography before seed implantation of prostate cancer. Ikeda T; Shinohara K Int J Urol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):190-1. PubMed ID: 18269465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of intra-observer variation in prostate volume measurement on prostate-specific antigen density calculations among prostate cancer active surveillance participants. Ko JS; Landis P; Carter HB; Partin AW BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1739-42. PubMed ID: 21736692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of three calliper-based transrectal ultrasound methods and digital rectal examination in the estimation of prostate volume and its changes with age: the Krimpen study. Bosch JL; Bohnen AM; Groeneveld FP; Bernsen R Prostate; 2005 Mar; 62(4):353-63. PubMed ID: 15389783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transrectal ultrasonic volumetry of the prostate: in vivo comparison of different methods. Bangma CH; Niemer AQ; Grobbee DE; Schröder FH Prostate; 1996 Feb; 28(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 8604390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Vesicoprostatic echography versus transrectal planimetry in the determination of prostatic volume]. Martínez Jabaloyas JM; Ruiz Cerdá JL; Osca García JM; Sanz Chinesta S; Boronat Tormo F; Jiménez Cruz JF Actas Urol Esp; 1993 May; 17(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 7688177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of measurement of prostatic volume by ultrasound. Comparison of transrectal and transabdominal methods. Styles RA; Neal DE; Powell PH Eur Urol; 1988; 14(4):266-9. PubMed ID: 2458933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver variation in the sonographic estimation of renal volume in children. Sargent MA; Long G; Karmali M; Cheng SM Pediatr Radiol; 1997 Aug; 27(8):663-6. PubMed ID: 9252431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]