These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1915619)

  • 1. A comparison of shear bond strengths between new and recycled ceramic brackets.
    Lew KK; Chew CL; Lee KW
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 13(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 1915619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recycling effects on ceramic brackets: a dimensional, weight and shear bond strength analysis.
    Martina R; Laino A; Cacciafesta V; Cantiello P
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 9458596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Winchester LJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 13(4):293-305. PubMed ID: 1915618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shear bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets.
    Chung CH; Friedman SD; Mante FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 12226610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
    Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
    Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention.
    Forsberg CM; Hagberg C
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 19(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 1390574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets.
    Bishara SE; Olsen M; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):617-21. PubMed ID: 9423693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of aged composites found in brackets placed by an indirect technique.
    Shiau JY; Rasmussen ST; Phelps AE; Enlow DH; Wolf GR
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 8214790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strengths of ceramic brackets using different bonding techniques.
    Blight SJ; Lynch E
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 7786864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets.
    Merrill SW; Oesterle LJ; Hermesch CB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 8074094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Boyer DB; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 8638582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets.
    Fernandez L; Canut JA
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 10191580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Britton JC; McInnes P; Weinberg R; Ledoux WR; Retief DH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 2145756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ex vivo shear bond strength of fibreglass reinforced aesthetic brackets.
    Crow V
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Nov; 22(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 8580098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.