These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19156565)

  • 1. Don't it make my brown eyes blue: co-witness misinformation about a target's appearance can impair target-absent line-up performance.
    Zajac R; Henderson N
    Memory; 2009 Apr; 17(3):266-78. PubMed ID: 19156565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence.
    Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "With a little help from my friends...": the role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation.
    Hope L; Ost J; Gabbert F; Healey S; Lenton E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 17937922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of face age on identification from a video line-up: a comparison between older and younger adults.
    Havard C; Memon A
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):847-59. PubMed ID: 19882436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect.
    Chan JC; Thomas AK; Bulevich JB
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19037905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrieval does not always enhance suggestibility: testing can improve witness identification performance.
    LaPaglia JA; Chan JC
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):478-87. PubMed ID: 23205595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social suggestibility to central and peripheral misinformation.
    Dalton AL; Daneman M
    Memory; 2006 May; 14(4):486-501. PubMed ID: 16766450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of calibration for reconstructed eye-witness memories.
    Bonham AJ; González-Vallejo C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 19362279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A problem with double-blind photospread procedures: photospread administrators use one eyewitness's confidence to influence the identification of another eyewitness.
    Douglass AB; Smith C; Fraser-Thill R
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):543-62. PubMed ID: 16254742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lineup administrators' expectations: their impact on eyewitness confidence.
    Garrioch L; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 11480805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating investigators: how presentation order influences participant-investigators' interpretations of eyewitness identification and alibi evidence.
    Dahl LC; Brimacombe CA; Lindsay DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):368-80. PubMed ID: 18810615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: the misinformation effect reconsidered.
    Campbell JM; Edwards MS; Horswill MS; Helman S
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):485-98. PubMed ID: 17705942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The phenomenology of carryover effects between show-up and line-up identification.
    Haw RM; Dickinson JJ; Meissner CA
    Memory; 2007 Jan; 15(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 17479929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An analogue study of the effects of Psychological Debriefing on eyewitness memory.
    Devilly GJ; Varker T; Hansen K; Gist R
    Behav Res Ther; 2007 Jun; 45(6):1245-54. PubMed ID: 17084811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paradoxical effects of testing: retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses.
    Chan JC; Langley MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 20919785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are co-witnesses special? Comparing the influence of co-witness and interviewer misinformation on eyewitness reports.
    Jack F; Zydervelt S; Zajac R
    Memory; 2014; 22(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 23521212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification accuracy for single- and double-perpetrator crimes: does accomplice gender matter?
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Nov; 103(4):439-53. PubMed ID: 23034106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.