BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19156671)

  • 1. Retributive constraints on the concept of competency: the required role of 'patently false beliefs' in understanding competency to be executed.
    Saks E; Litt M
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 19156671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary: Atkins on a diet--a fit but lean guide for policy-makers.
    Fitch WL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):314-6. PubMed ID: 15515921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
    Bonnie RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competency to be executed: Panetti v. Quarterman.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2007; 31(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 17969780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Murderer can be forced to take medication to become sane enough to be executed.
    Gottlieb S
    BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7420):889. PubMed ID: 14563734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An unjust act: the schizophrenic state of maturity and culpability in juvenile justice and minor abortion rights law; recent trends in Virginia and nationally.
    Foxworth JM
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):495-533. PubMed ID: 15977329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some contrarian concerns about law, psychology, and public policy.
    Bersoff DN
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Oct; 26(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 12412498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of competency for execution: professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist.
    Zapf PA; Boccaccini MT; Brodsky SL
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):103-20. PubMed ID: 12579621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Competency to Proceed to Trial Evaluations and Rational Understanding.
    Ragatz L; Vitacco MJ; Tross R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Dec; 59(14):1505-19. PubMed ID: 25080435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A National Survey of State Legislation defining mental retardation: implications for policy and practice after Atkins.
    DeMatteo D; Marczyk G; Pich M
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):781-802. PubMed ID: 18046743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ferguson v. Florida: rationally understanding competence to be executed?
    Wadsworth CS; Newman WJ; Burton PR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 24986351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asperger's disorder and murder.
    Schwartz-Watts DM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):390-3. PubMed ID: 16186206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth.
    Siegel DM
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 21683911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Competency in the criminal context: an analysis of Robert Schopp's views.
    Slobogin C
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 16883613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Law & psychiatry: punishing juveniles who kill.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2012 Oct; 63(10):956-8. PubMed ID: 23032673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is the death of the death penalty near? The impact of Atkins and Roper on the future of capital punishment for mentally ill defendants.
    Shin H
    Fordham Law Rev; 2007 Oct; 76(1):465-516. PubMed ID: 17985486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commentary: Atkins and clinical practice.
    Weiss KJ; Haskins B; Hauser MJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15515920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The guilty mind and criminal sentencing: integrating legal and empirical inquiry as illustrated by capital sentencing.
    Schopp RF; Patry MW
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):631-51. PubMed ID: 14502693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.