371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19157731)
1. Effects of filtration through Sephadex columns improve overall quality parameters and "in vivo" fertility of subfertile refrigerated boar-semen.
Ramió-Lluch L; Balasch S; Bonet S; Briz M; Pinart E; Rodríguez-Gil JE
Anim Reprod Sci; 2009 Oct; 115(1-4):189-200. PubMed ID: 19157731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of column filtration upon the quality parameters of fresh dog semen.
Mogas T; Rigau T; Piedrafita J; Bonet S; Rodríguez-Gil JE
Theriogenology; 1998 Dec; 50(8):1171-89. PubMed ID: 10734433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of matrix filtration of low-quality boar semen doses on sperm quality.
Bussalleu E; Pinart E; Rivera MM; Briz M; Sancho S; Yeste M; Casas I; Fàbrega A; Rigau T; Rodriguez-Gil JE; Bonet S
Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Jun; 44(3):499-503. PubMed ID: 19192214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High resolution light microscopic evaluation of boar semen quality sperm cytoplasmic droplet retention in relationship with boar fertility parameters.
Lovercamp KW; Safranski TJ; Fischer KA; Manandhar G; Sutovsky M; Herring W; Sutovsky P
Arch Androl; 2007; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 17852046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo.
Tardif S; Laforest JP; Cormier N; Bailey JL
Theriogenology; 1999 Aug; 52(3):447-59. PubMed ID: 10734379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of filtration of semen doses from subfertile boars through neuter Sephadex columns.
Bussalleu E; Pinart E; Rivera MM; Arias X; Briz M; Sancho S; García-Gil N; Bassols J; Pruneda A; Yeste M; Casas I; Rigau T; Rodriguez-Gil JE; Bonet S
Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Feb; 43(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 18199258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials.
Holt C; Holt WV; Moore HD; Reed HC; Curnock RM
J Androl; 1997; 18(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 9203061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of whole ejaculate filtration on the morphology and the fertility of bovine semen.
Graham EF; Graham JK
J Dairy Sci; 1990 Jan; 73(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 2312886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multivariate cluster analysis regression procedures as tools to identify motile sperm subpopulations in rabbit semen and to predict semen fertility and litter size.
Quintero-Moreno A; Rigau T; Rodríguez-Gil JE
Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Jun; 42(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 17506811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility.
Broekhuijse ML; Šoštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):779-89. PubMed ID: 22064743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The predictive value of routine semen evaluation and IVF technology for determining relative boar fertility.
Ruiz-Sánchez AL; O'donoghue R; Novak S; Dyck MK; Cosgrove JR; Dixon WT; Foxcroft GR
Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(4):736-48. PubMed ID: 16529803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do parameters of seminal quality correlate with the results of on-farm inseminations in rabbits?
Lavara R; Mocé E; Lavara F; Viudes de Castro MP; Vicente JS
Theriogenology; 2005 Sep; 64(5):1130-41. PubMed ID: 16125557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Porcine field fertility with two different insemination doses and the effect of sperm morphology.
Alm K; Peltoniemi OA; Koskinen E; Andersson M
Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Jun; 41(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 16689883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New aspects of boar semen freezing strategies.
Grossfeld R; Sieg B; Struckmann C; Frenzel A; Maxwell WM; Rath D
Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1225-33. PubMed ID: 18774169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of embryo paternity using polymorphic DNA markers to assess fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa after heterospermic insemination in boars.
Stahlberg R; Harlizius B; Weitze KF; Waberski D
Theriogenology; 2000 Apr; 53(6):1365-73. PubMed ID: 10832760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural Mediterranean photoperiod does not affect the main parameters of boar-semen quality analysis.
Rivera MM; Quintero-Moreno A; Barrera X; Palomo MJ; Rigau T; Rodríguez-Gil JE
Theriogenology; 2005 Sep; 64(4):934-46. PubMed ID: 16054497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Field data analysis of boar semen quality.
Broekhuijse ML; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
Reprod Domest Anim; 2011 Sep; 46 Suppl 2():59-63. PubMed ID: 21884280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-assisted semen analysis and its utility for profiling boar semen samples.
Didion BA
Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1374-6. PubMed ID: 18723215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions.
Gadea J; Sellés E; Marco MA
Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Oct; 39(5):303-8. PubMed ID: 15367261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of an in vitro index to characterize fertilizing capacity of boar ejaculates.
Schulze M; Ruediger K; Mueller K; Jung M; Well C; Reissmann M
Anim Reprod Sci; 2013 Jul; 140(1-2):70-6. PubMed ID: 23773327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
