922 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19158805)
1. Pregnancy outcome after placement of 'rescue' Shirodkar cerclage.
Ventolini G; Genrich TJ; Roth J; Neiger R
J Perinatol; 2009 Apr; 29(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 19158805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emergency cerclage compared with bed rest for advanced cervical dilatation in pregnancy.
Olatunbosun OA; al-Nuaim L; Turnell RW
Int Surg; 1995; 80(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 8530237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of cervical cerclage and preterm premature rupture of the membranes: should the stitch be removed?
McElrath TF; Norwitz ER; Lieberman ES; Heffner LJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 11035323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald.
Hume H; Rebarber A; Saltzman DH; Roman AS; Fox NS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2690-2. PubMed ID: 22873518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of double cervical cerclage in women with at least one previous pregnancy loss in the second trimester: a randomized controlled trial.
Tsai YL; Lin YH; Chong KM; Huang LW; Hwang JL; Seow KM
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Aug; 35(4):666-71. PubMed ID: 19751325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expectant management compared with physical examination-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) in selected women with a dilated cervix at 14(0/7)-25(6/7) weeks: results from the EM-PEC international cohort study.
Pereira L; Cotter A; Gómez R; Berghella V; Prasertcharoensuk W; Rasanen J; Chaithongwongwatthana S; Mittal S; Daly S; Airoldi J; Tolosa JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):483.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17980182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patients with a prior failed transvaginal cerclage: a comparison of obstetric outcomes with either transabdominal or transvaginal cerclage.
Davis G; Berghella V; Talucci M; Wapner RJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):836-9. PubMed ID: 11035322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Labor outcomes after Shirodkar cerclage.
Fox NS; Rebarber A; Bender S; Saltzman DH
J Reprod Med; 2009 Jun; 54(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 19639925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two cervical cerclages for the prevention of preterm birth and neonatal complications.
Wong CH; Chen CP; Wang KG; Sun FJ; Chen CY
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Mar; 30(5):551-555. PubMed ID: 27072547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Amniocentesis prior to physical exam-indicated cerclage in women with midtrimester cervical dilation: results from the expectant management compared to Physical Exam-indicated Cerclage international cohort study.
Airoldi J; Pereira L; Cotter A; Gomez R; Berghella V; Prasertcharoensuk W; Rasanen J; Chaithongwongwatthana S; Mittal S; Kearney E; Tolosa JE
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 18979415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mid-trimester emergent cerclage: a ten year single institution review.
Chasen ST; Silverman NS
J Perinatol; 1998; 18(5):338-42. PubMed ID: 9766407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aggressive intervention of previable preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Miyazaki K; Furuhashi M; Yoshida K; Ishikawa K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):923-9. PubMed ID: 22536879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic cervico-isthmic cerclage: surgical technique and obstetric outcomes.
Whittle WL; Singh SS; Allen L; Glaude L; Thomas J; Windrim R; Leyland N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 201(4):364.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19788969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The CLIPED procedure: an attempt to improve perinatal outcome in hopeless situations.
Weinstein L; Okin CR; Fellens TE
J Perinatol; 1996; 16(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 8869536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does indomethacin prevent preterm birth in women with cervical dilatation in the second trimester?
Berghella V; Prasertcharoensuk W; Cotter A; Rasanen J; Mittal S; Chaithongwongwatthana S; Gomez R; Kearney E; Tolosa JE; Pereira L
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19021101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short cervical length after history-indicated cerclage: is a reinforcing cerclage beneficial?
Baxter JK; Airoldi J; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1204-7. PubMed ID: 16157138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical length, cervical dilation, and gestational age at cerclage placement and the risk of preterm birth in women undergoing ultrasound or exam indicated Shirodkar cerclage.
Bigelow CA; Naqvi M; Namath AG; Ali M; Fox NS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Aug; 33(15):2527-2532. PubMed ID: 30486708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth: impact of body mass index.
Figueroa R; Crowell R; Martinez A; Morgan M; Wakefield D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(20):3408-3414. PubMed ID: 29712493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pregnancy outcomes following placement of elective, urgent and emergent cerclage.
Nelson L; Dola T; Tran T; Carter M; Luu H; Dola C
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Mar; 22(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 19330713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elective and emergency transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage for cervical incompetence.
Hole J; Tressler T; Martinez F
J Reprod Med; 2003 Aug; 48(8):596-600. PubMed ID: 12971139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
