These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19159149)

  • 1. Signal detection with criterion noise: applications to recognition memory.
    Benjamin AS; Diaz M; Wee S
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):84-115. PubMed ID: 19159149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.
    Ratcliff R; Starns JJ
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 19159148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments.
    Inoue C; Bellezza FS
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 9584437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the multimemory and detection theories of know and remember recognition judgments.
    Xu M; Bellezza FS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1197-210. PubMed ID: 11550748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory.
    Singer M
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):976-84. PubMed ID: 19744937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing models of decision making using confidence ratings in classification.
    Balakrishnan JD; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):615-33. PubMed ID: 8666956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remember and know judgments during recognition in chronic schizophrenia.
    van Erp TG; Lesh TA; Knowlton BJ; Bearden CE; Hardt M; Karlsgodt KH; Shirinyan D; Rao V; Green MF; Subotnik KL; Nuechterlein K; Cannon TD
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Mar; 100(1-3):181-90. PubMed ID: 17964760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulating recognition decisions through incremental reinforcement learning.
    Han S; Dobbins IG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):469-74. PubMed ID: 19451370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: the case of recognition memory.
    Kellen D; Klauer KC; Singmann H
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jul; 119(3):457-79. PubMed ID: 22468607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.
    Donaldson W
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 8757500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).
    Benjamin AS
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 23915089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis.
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Aug; 73(8):1242-1260. PubMed ID: 31986982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments.
    Stretch V; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1397-410. PubMed ID: 9835060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback.
    Rhodes MG; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 17352613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes.
    Masson ME; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):509-27. PubMed ID: 19271863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes.
    Banks WP
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Jul; 11(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 11273383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The systematic discrepancy between A' for overall recognition and remembering: a dual-process account.
    Dobbins IG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):587-99. PubMed ID: 11700911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Widespread frontoparietal fMRI activity is greatly affected by changes in criterion placement, not discriminability, during recognition memory and visual detection tests.
    Layher E; Santander T; Chakravarthula P; Marinsek N; Turner BO; Eckstein MP; Miller MB
    Neuroimage; 2023 Oct; 279():120307. PubMed ID: 37543259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic.
    McCabe DP; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):536-49. PubMed ID: 17470004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.
    Stretch V; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1379-96. PubMed ID: 9835059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.