These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1915953)

  • 41. Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: the relevance of age, awareness, and family form.
    Hertz R; Nelson MK; Kramer W
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Jun; 86():52-65. PubMed ID: 23608094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sperm donor recruitment, attitudes and provider practices--5 years after the removal of donor anonymity.
    Shukla U; Deval B; Jansa Perez M; Hamoda H; Savvas M; Narvekar N
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar; 28(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 23315068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Semen donors in Germany: a study exploring motivations and attitudes.
    Thorn P; Katzorke T; Daniels K
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Nov; 23(11):2415-20. PubMed ID: 18653672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The views of adult offspring of sperm donation: essential feedback for the development of ethical guidelines within the practice of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
    Mahlstedt PP; LaBounty K; Kennedy WT
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2236-46. PubMed ID: 19285663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Danish sperm donors across three decades: motivations and attitudes.
    Bay B; Larsen PB; Kesmodel US; Ingerslev HJ
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):252-257.e1. PubMed ID: 24140034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contact among families who share the same sperm donor.
    Scheib JE; Ruby A
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 18023432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Are you my sperm donor? Few clinics will say.
    Harmon A
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 16432927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
    Svanberg AS; Sydsjö G; Bladh M; Lampic C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Donor in conception stories: narrative practices by parents conceiving with donated spermatozoa].
    Doumergue M; Kalampalikis N
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Sep; 42(9):630-2. PubMed ID: 25153434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring.
    Jadva V; Freeman T; Kramer W; Golombok S
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar; 26(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 21177310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation.
    Isaksson S; Sydsjö G; Skoog Svanberg A; Lampic C
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation.
    Van den Broeck U; Vandermeeren M; Vanderschueren D; Enzlin P; Demyttenaere K; D'Hooghe T
    Hum Reprod Update; 2013; 19(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 23146866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective.
    Rodino IS; Burton PJ; Sanders KA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Mar; 22(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 21269882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. New birth technologies: a social work approach to researching the psychosocial factors.
    Daniels KR
    Soc Work Health Care; 1986; 11(4):49-60. PubMed ID: 3775614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Toward a family-building approach to donor insemination.
    Daniels KR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Jan; 24(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 12196884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sperm donor limits that control for the 'relative' risk associated with the use of open-identity donors.
    Sawyer N
    Hum Reprod; 2010 May; 25(5):1089-96. PubMed ID: 20172868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Attitudes among sperm donors in 1992 and 2002: a Danish questionnaire survey.
    Ernst E; Ingerslev HJ; Schou O; Stoltenberg M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 17364308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fecundability trends among sperm donors as a measure of donor performance.
    Thyer AC; Patton PE; Burry KA; Mixon BA; Wolf DP
    Fertil Steril; 1999 May; 71(5):891-5. PubMed ID: 10231052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12-17 year olds.
    Scheib JE; Riordan M; Rubin S
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan; 20(1):239-52. PubMed ID: 15539443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.