415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19159560)
1. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
Du Q; Wang ZM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
Kumar G; Chokshi M; Richter CP
Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.
Spelman FA; Clopton BM; Pfingst BE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():3-8. PubMed ID: 6814331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The internal dimensions of the cochlear scalae with special reference to cochlear electrode insertion trauma.
Biedron S; Prescher A; Ilgner J; Westhofen M
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 20142798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Lane JI; Witte RJ; Driscoll CL; Shallop JK; Beatty CW; Primak AN
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):658-62. PubMed ID: 17558341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of electrical current configuration on potential fields in the electrically stimulated cochlea: field models and measurements.
Spelman FA; Pfingst BE; Clopton BM; Jolly CN; Rodenhiser KL
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():131-6. PubMed ID: 7668604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Impedance between modiolus and different walls of scala tympani].
Du Q; Wang Z
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 22(19):878-9. PubMed ID: 19160859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomy of the middle-turn cochleostomy.
Isaacson B; Roland PS; Wright CG
Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2200-4. PubMed ID: 18948831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multichannel cochlear implantation in the scala vestibuli.
Lin K; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 16788421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.
Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Lehnert T; Gstoettner W
Laryngoscope; 2004 Jul; 114(7):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15235353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.
Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scala tympani measurement.
Walby AP
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(4 Pt 1):393-7. PubMed ID: 3896104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of an electrode design for the combined electric-acoustic stimulation].
Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Radeloff A; Lehnert T; Gstöttner W
Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Oct; 83(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal bone investigations on landmarks for conventional or endosteal insertion of cochlear electrodes.
Pau HW; Just T; Dommerich S; Behrend D
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):920-6. PubMed ID: 17712669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
