BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19159560)

  • 21. Intraoperative Electrophysiologic Variations Caused by the Scalar Position of Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
    Mittmann P; Ernst A; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 25730445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Midmodiolar reconstruction as a valuable tool to determine the exact position of the cochlear implant electrode array.
    Lecerf P; Bakhos D; Cottier JP; Lescanne E; Trijolet JP; Robier A
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1075-81. PubMed ID: 21817940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Applied anatomy of scala tympani inlet related to cochlear implantation].
    Zou T; Guo M; Zhang H; Shu F; Xie N
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(6):904-7. PubMed ID: 22699082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Sep; 135(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 16949967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.
    Baumann U; Nobbe A
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 16442249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
    Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Electrode array-eluted dexamethasone protects against electrode insertion trauma induced hearing and hair cell losses, damage to neural elements, increases in impedance and fibrosis: A dose response study.
    Bas E; Bohorquez J; Goncalves S; Perez E; Dinh CT; Garnham C; Hessler R; Eshraghi AA; Van De Water TR
    Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():12-24. PubMed ID: 26892906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of Translocation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays by Intracochlear Impedance Measurements.
    Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Siebrecht M; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 33974777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A complex case of cochlear implant electrode placement.
    Cohen NL
    Am J Otol; 1990 Sep; 11(5):383. PubMed ID: 2240188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inroads toward robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery using steerable electrode arrays.
    Zhang J; Wei W; Ding J; Roland JT; Manolidis S; Simaan N
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1199-206. PubMed ID: 20864880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro modifications of the scala tympani environment and the cochlear implant array surface.
    Kontorinis G; Scheper V; Wissel K; Stöver T; Lenarz T; Paasche G
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):2057-63. PubMed ID: 22648595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements.
    Sijgers L; Huber A; Tabibi S; Grosse J; Roosli C; Boyle P; Koka K; Dillier N; Pfiffner F; Dalbert A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 69(8):2533-2544. PubMed ID: 35143392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrical resistivity measurements in the mammalian cochlea after neural degeneration.
    Micco AG; Richter CP
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1334-41. PubMed ID: 16885732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The location of inserting the electrode into the cochlear].
    Zhang DX
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 May; 14(5):195-6. PubMed ID: 12541539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrical impedance guides electrode array in cochlear implantation using machine learning and robotic feeder.
    Hafeez N; Du X; Boulgouris N; Begg P; Irving R; Coulson C; Tourrel G
    Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 412():108371. PubMed ID: 34689069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of the insertion speed of cochlear implant electrodes on the insertion forces.
    Kontorinis G; Lenarz T; Stöver T; Paasche G
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):565-70. PubMed ID: 21478788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode.
    Kiefer J; Böhnke F; Adunka O; Arnold W
    Hear Res; 2006 Nov; 221(1-2):36-43. PubMed ID: 16962268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Observation on the change of electrode impedance and THR/MCL values in 20 cases with Med-EL Combi 40+ cochlear implant].
    Wu W; Jia H; Li Y; Tang Z; Huang Q; Yang J; Mei L; Haung Z; Wu H
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(22):1238-42. PubMed ID: 24616980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.