415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19159560)
41. Neural mechanisms relevant to the design of an auditory prosthesis. Location and electrical characteristics.
Clopton BM; Spelman FA
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():9-14. PubMed ID: 6814332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids.
Paasche G; Bockel F; Tasche C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 16868511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Long-term evaluation of the effect of intracochlear steroid deposition on electrode impedance in cochlear implant patients.
De Ceulaer G; Johnson S; Yperman M; Daemers K; Offeciers FE; O'Donoghue GM; Govaerts PJ
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):769-74. PubMed ID: 14501455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. 3D curved multiplanar cone beam CT reconstruction for intracochlear position assessment of straight electrodes array. A temporal bone and clinical study.
De Seta D; Mancini P; Russo FY; Torres R; Mosnier I; Bensimon JL; De Seta E; Heymann D; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D; Nguyen Y
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2016 Dec; 36(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 27600104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Nucleus Contour electrode array: a radiological and histological study.
Richter B; Aschendorff A; Lohnstein P; Husstedt H; Nagursky H; Laszig R
Laryngoscope; 2001 Mar; 111(3):508-14. PubMed ID: 11224784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli.
Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Radeloff A; Gstoettner W
Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 30(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 15839863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Local dexamethasone therapy conserves hearing in an animal model of electrode insertion trauma-induced hearing loss.
Eshraghi AA; Adil E; He J; Graves R; Balkany TJ; Van De Water TR
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):842-9. PubMed ID: 17471110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Scala tympani cochleostomy II: topography and histology.
Adunka OF; Radeloff A; Gstoettner WK; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
Laryngoscope; 2007 Dec; 117(12):2195-200. PubMed ID: 17909447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. On the Intracochlear Location of Straight Electrode Arrays After Cochlear Implantation: How Lateral Are Lateral Wall Electrodes?
Salcher R; Boruchov A; Timm M; Steffens M; Giesemann A; Lenarz T; Warnecke A
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Feb; 42(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 33026778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.
Cartee LA; Miller CA; van den Honert C
Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):10-21. PubMed ID: 16624511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Determinants of the effectiveness of cochlear implants: I. Placement in the cochlea].
Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 11039219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multiple-electrode intracochlear implant.
Webb RL; Clark GM; Shepherd RK; Franz BK; Pyman BC
Am J Otol; 1988 Jan; 9(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 3364540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [A new method for REZ-1 cochlear implant electrode array insertion].
Du Q; Wang ZM
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 44(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 19954027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Basic fitting and evaluation parameters of a newly designed cochlear implant electrode.
Deman PR; Daemers K; Yperman M; Offeciers FE; Plasmans A; Van Dijk B; Govaerts PJ
Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Apr; 124(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 15141756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants.
Razmovski T; Bester C; Collins A; Tan E; O'Leary SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1107-e1114. PubMed ID: 36351225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Impedance development after implantation of hybrid-L24 cochlear implant electrodes.
Konrad S; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Paasche G
Int J Audiol; 2023 Dec; 62(12):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 36193989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
Aschendorff A; Kromeier J; Klenzner T; Laszig R
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Tissue resistivities determine the current flow in the cochlea.
Micco AG; Richter CP
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 16974151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
