These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1915989)

  • 1. The epithelial interface with osseointegrated implants.
    Kellett M; Smith GA
    Dent Health (London); 1991; 30(3):6-9, 12. PubMed ID: 1915989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental Implants. Part I: Biological basis, implant types, and the peri-implant sulcus.
    Danesh-Meyer MJ
    J N Z Soc Periodontol; 1994 May; (77):15-22. PubMed ID: 8699485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Osseointegration of IMZ implants. Ultrastructural analysis of a case].
    Lopéz Arranz JS; de Vicente Rodriguez JC; Valle Soto ME; Sicilia Felechosa A; Alvarez Alvarez I
    Rev Eur Odontoestomatol; 1990; 2(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 2094264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osseointegration of rough acid-etched titanium implants: 5-year follow-up of 100 minimatic implants.
    De Leonardis D; Garg AK; Pecora GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):384-91. PubMed ID: 10379112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative investigation in dogs: 2-year morphometric results of the dental implant--bone interface.
    Steflik DE; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Davis HC; Adams BO; Yavari J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 8820118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses.
    Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of wide implants and double implants in the posterior jaw: a clinical report.
    Bahat O; Handelsman M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 8752559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tissue integration of A12O3-ceramic dental implants (Frialit)--a case report.
    Anneroth G; Ericsson AR; Zetterqvist L
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 2374995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hard tissue implant interface.
    Albrektsson T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53 Suppl 1():S34-8. PubMed ID: 18498583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
    Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hydroxyapatite coated dental implants. Biological criteria and prosthetic possibilities].
    Krauser JT; Boner C; Boner N
    Cah Prothese; 1990 Sep; (71):56-75. PubMed ID: 2268780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The implant-mucosal interface and its role in the long-term success of endosseous oral implants: a review of the literature.
    Koka S
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):421-32. PubMed ID: 9922734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
    Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Periodontal requirements in osseointegrated and biointegrated implantology].
    Saadoun AP
    Cah Prothese; 1990 Sep; (71):126-47. PubMed ID: 2268775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study on the attachment of human gingival cell structures to oral implant materials.
    Simion M; Baldoni M; Rossi P
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 1817526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of combinations of titanium, zirconia, and alumina implants with 2 bone fillers in the dog.
    Dubruille JH; Viguier E; Le Naour G; Dubruille MT; Auriol M; Le Charpentier Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 10212545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
    Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histomorphometric analyses of bone interface with titanium-aluminum-vanadium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants by biomimetic process.
    Zagury R; Harari ND; Conz MB; Soares Gde A; Vidigal GM
    Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 17846545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.