These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1916045)

  • 1. Optimization of automated hearing test algorithms: a comparison of data from simulations and young children.
    Eilers RE; Widen JE; Urbano R; Hudson T; Gonzales L
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 1916045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of automated hearing test algorithms: simulations using an infant response model.
    Eilers RE; Miskiel E; Ozdamar O; Urbano R; Widen JE
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 1916044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of audiograms by sequential testing: reliability and validity of an automated behavioral hearing screening algorithm.
    Eilers RE; Ozdamar O; Steffens ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):172-81. PubMed ID: 8318708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioural tests: applications and limitations in comparison with brainstem response audiometry.
    Hirsch A
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 482():118-24; discussion 125. PubMed ID: 1897356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer simulation technique for assessing pediatric auditory test protocols.
    Tharpe AM; Ashmead DH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Mar; 4(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 8471789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated auditory response detection: Further improvement of the statistical test strategy by using progressive test steps of iteration.
    Cebulla M; Stürzebecher E
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug; 54(8):568-72. PubMed ID: 25831956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phase stability of auditory steady state responses in newborn infants.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):593-604. PubMed ID: 21422930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the localization auditory screening test in children 6-18 months of age.
    Tillis CH; Grimm WA
    Am J Public Health; 1978 Jan; 68(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 623365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the vector algorithm for neonatal hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem response.
    Keohane BM; Mason SM; Baguley DM
    J Laryngol Otol; 2004 Feb; 118(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 14979947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing screening for Japanese children and young adults using the automated auditory brainstem response.
    Soares M; Nakazawa M; Ishikawa K; Sato T; Honda K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Feb; 41(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 24007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study].
    Huang LH; Deng XQ; Yang YL; Wang SJ; Tang XQ; Guo LS; Han DM
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of degree of hearing loss on auditory brainstem response predictions of behavioral thresholds.
    McCreery RW; Kaminski J; Beauchaine K; Lenzen N; Simms K; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 25470369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Problems in the evaluation of hearing of infants].
    Hata F; Sakoda T; Nosaka A; Hasegawa K; Kitano H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2005 Jul; 108(7):742-9. PubMed ID: 16107049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The influence of conductive hearing loss on DPOAE-threshold. The effect of an individually optimized stimulation].
    Kummer P; Schuster EM; Rosanowski F; Eysholdt U; Lohscheller J
    HNO; 2006 Jun; 54(6):457-64, 466-7. PubMed ID: 16283131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are Auditory Steady-State Responses Useful to Evaluate Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss in Children?
    Grasel SS; de Almeida ER; Beck RM; Goffi-Gomez MV; Ramos HF; Rossi AC; Koji Tsuji R; Bento RF; de Brito R
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():579206. PubMed ID: 26557677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992-1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening.
    Mehl AL; Thomson V
    Pediatrics; 2002 Jan; 109(1):E7. PubMed ID: 11773575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated auditory response detection: Improvement of the statistical test strategy.
    Stürzebecher E; Cebulla M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):861-4. PubMed ID: 24219121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of heart rate response for the assessment of hearing in infants.
    Suzuki T
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978; 87(2 Pt 1):243-7. PubMed ID: 646295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electrophysiologic hearing evaluation in childhood--a critical assessment].
    Begall K; von Specht H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 1():129-48. PubMed ID: 8012235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.