These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1916047)

  • 1. Reliability and intersubject variability of the real ear unaided response.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 1916047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probe-tube microphone measures with very young infants: real ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real ear unaided response.
    Westwood GF; Bamford JM
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 7672475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intratester test-retest reliability of insertion gain measures.
    Valente M; Meister M; Smith P; Goebel J
    Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 2358127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM; Shaver MD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids.
    Fikret-Pasa S; Revit LJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):384-400. PubMed ID: 1573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real ear unaided responses in ears with tympanic membrane perforations.
    Moryl CL; Danhauer JL; DiBartolomeo JR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jan; 3(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 1571588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimated variability of real-ear insertion response (REIR) due to loudspeaker type and placement.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2004 May; 43(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 15357410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of occluded ear impedances on the eardrum SPL produced by hearing aids.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD; Stern R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Aug; 70(2):370-86. PubMed ID: 7288025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the CARL manikin for use in "patient-free" real ear measurement: consistency and comparison to normative data.
    Folkeard P; Alam M; Koch R; Abbasalipour P; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 35343874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probe-tube microphone measurements with very young infants.
    Westwood GF; Bamford JM
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Jun; 26(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 1393152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-retest reliability of in situ unaided thresholds in adults.
    Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N; Chivers C; Highley P; Williams DK
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16803794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of reference microphone location and loudspeaker azimuth on probe tube microphone measurements.
    Ickes MA; Hawkins DB; Cooper WA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Jul; 2(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 1768884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calibration of ear canals for audiometry at high frequencies.
    Stevens KN; Berkovitz R; Kidd G; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):470-84. PubMed ID: 3558965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anticipating real-ear insertion response using an external auditory canal model.
    Taiji H; Okamoto Y; Kanzaki J
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2022 Jun; 49(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 34756490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of real ear insertion gain in behind-the-ear hearing aids with different coupling systems to the ear canal.
    Jespersen CT; Møller KN
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Mar; 52(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 23301659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Shera CA; Peake WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65. PubMed ID: 10738809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probe-tube microphone measures in patients with open-mastoid surgery: real-ear-to-coupler differences and real-ear unaided responses.
    Liu TC; Lin KN
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 10720821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring in-the-ear gain of hearing aids by the acoustic reflex method.
    Tonisson W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Mar; 18(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 1127901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.