209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1916097)
1. Research funding.
FASEB J; 1991 Sep; 5(12):2741-2. PubMed ID: 1916097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review reviewed.
Mehl JW
Fed Proc; 1975 Aug; 34(9):i-iv. PubMed ID: 1149887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial: Judicium parium.
Fishman AP
N Engl J Med; 1974 Jan; 290(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 4808447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurturing the biomedical research enterprise.
Wyngaarden JB
P R Health Sci J; 1986 Aug; 5(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3823360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health.
Kirschstein RL
Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Visceral viewpoints. Goals and controls - grants and contracts.
Spiro HM
N Engl J Med; 1975 Sep; 293(11):545-7. PubMed ID: 1152879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The National Institutes of Health yesterday, today, and tomorrow.
Fredrickson DS
Public Health Rep; 1978; 93(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 362469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council.
Henley C
Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2335-8. PubMed ID: 892000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomedical research funding. A minority viewpoint.
Price M
Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6045):926. PubMed ID: 21852463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. NSF probes peer review; NIH investigates awards.
Change; 1976 Feb; 8(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 1030336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Disease burden predicts US government health research funding.
Bull World Health Organ; 1999; 77(8):704-5. PubMed ID: 10516793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
Kaiser J
Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Washington report: a conversation with Vincent T. DeVita, Jr., M.D.. Interview by Daniel S. Greenberg.
DeVita VT
N Engl J Med; 1980 Oct; 303(17):1014-6. PubMed ID: 7412849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposal for public archive draws support, criticism.
Travis K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1416. PubMed ID: 15467028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.
Bucy PC
Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review: NIH urged to streamline bids..
Gavaghan H
Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6486):170-1. PubMed ID: 8028655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
