BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

510 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19162529)

  • 1. A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X-ray images.
    Zheng G; Gollmer S; Schumann S; Dong X; Feilkas T; González Ballester MA
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Dec; 13(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 19162529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reconstruction of patient-specific 3D bone surface from 2D calibrated fluoroscopic images and point distribution model.
    Zheng G; Ballester MA; Styner M; Nolte LP
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):25-32. PubMed ID: 17354870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
    Zheng G
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous 3D-2D image registration and C-arm calibration: Application to endovascular image-guided interventions.
    Mitrović U; Pernuš F; Likar B; Špiclin Ž
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6433-47. PubMed ID: 26520733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fully automatic reconstruction of personalized 3D volumes of the proximal femur from 2D X-ray images.
    Yu W; Chu C; Tannast M; Zheng G
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Sep; 11(9):1673-85. PubMed ID: 27038965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine and pelvis from uncalibrated biplanar x-ray images.
    Kadoury S; Cheriet F; Dansereau J; Labelle H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 17414987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SIFT algorithm-based 3D pose estimation of femur.
    Zhang X; Zhu Y; Li C; Zhao J; Li G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2847-55. PubMed ID: 25226990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic radiograph based 3D bone reconstruction framework: application to osteotomy surgical planning.
    Gamage P; Xie SQ; Delmas P; Xu WL
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 3):481-8. PubMed ID: 20879435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 2D-3D shape reconstruction of the distal femur from stereo X-ray imaging using statistical shape models.
    Baka N; Kaptein BL; de Bruijne M; van Walsum T; Giphart JE; Niessen WJ; Lelieveldt BP
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Dec; 15(6):840-50. PubMed ID: 21600836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated 3-D PDM construction from segmented images using deformable models.
    Kaus MR; Pekar V; Lorenz C; Truyen R; Lobregt S; Weese J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1005-13. PubMed ID: 12906254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accurate and robust reconstruction of a surface model of the proximal femur from sparse-point data and a dense-point distribution model for surgical navigation.
    Zheng G; Dong X; Rajamani KT; Zhang X; Styner M; Thoranaghatte RU; Nolte LP; Ballester MA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Dec; 54(12):2109-22. PubMed ID: 18075027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personalized X-ray reconstruction of the proximal femur via intensity-based non-rigid 2D-3D registration.
    Zheng G
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 2):598-606. PubMed ID: 21995078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D reconstruction of a patient-specific surface model of the proximal femur from calibrated x-ray radiographs: a validation study.
    Zheng G; Schumann S
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1155-66. PubMed ID: 19472621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D/2D image registration: the impact of X-ray views and their number.
    Tomazevic D; Likar B; Pernus F
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):450-7. PubMed ID: 18051090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relevance of 2D radiographic texture analysis for the assessment of 3D bone micro-architecture.
    Apostol L; Boudousq V; Basset O; Odet C; Yot S; Tabary J; Dinten JM; Boiler E; Kotzki PO; Peyrin F
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3546-56. PubMed ID: 17022251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biplanar reconstruction method based on 2D and 3D contours: application to the distal femur.
    Laporte S; Skalli W; de Guise JA; Lavaste F; Mitton D
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Feb; 6(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12623432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lambda tomography with discontinuous scanning trajectories.
    Yu H; Wei Y; Ye Y; Wang G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4331-44. PubMed ID: 17664611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Error analysis of marker-based object localization using a single-plane XRII.
    Habets DF; Pollmann SI; Yuan X; Peters TM; Holdsworth DW
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):190-200. PubMed ID: 19235387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3D femur model reconstruction from biplane X-ray images: a novel method based on Laplacian surface deformation.
    Karade V; Ravi B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Apr; 10(4):473-85. PubMed ID: 25037878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.