These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19163063)

  • 1. Automatic classification of chromosomes in Q-band images.
    Poletti E; Grisan E; Ruggeri A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1911-4. PubMed ID: 19163063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A modular framework for the automatic classification of chromosomes in Q-band images.
    Poletti E; Grisan E; Ruggeri A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Feb; 105(2):120-30. PubMed ID: 21963236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic chromosome pairing using mutual information.
    Khmelinskii A; Ventura R; Sanches J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1918-21. PubMed ID: 19163065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometric correction of deformed chromosomes for automatic Karyotyping.
    Khan S; DSouza A; Sanches J; Ventura R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4438-41. PubMed ID: 23366912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic segmentation and disentangling of chromosomes in Q-band prometaphase images.
    Grisan E; Poletti E; Ruggeri A
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jul; 13(4):575-81. PubMed ID: 19193514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated classification of metaphase chromosomes: optimization of an adaptive computerized scheme.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Wood MC; Liu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2009 Feb; 42(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18585097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subspace-based prototyping and classification of chromosome images.
    Wu Q; Liu Z; Chen T; Xiong Z; Castleman KR
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2005 Sep; 14(9):1277-87. PubMed ID: 16190464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic segmentation of chromosomes in Q-band images.
    Grisan E; Poletti E; Tomelleri C; Ruggeri A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5513-6. PubMed ID: 18003260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-assisted karyotyping system of banded chromosomes.
    Bruschi C; Tedeschi F; Puglisi PP; Marmiroli N
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1981; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7460628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Karyotyping of comparative genomic hybridization human metaphases by using support vector machines.
    Kou Z; Ji L; Zhang X
    Cytometry; 2002 Jan; 47(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11774345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A watershed based segmentation method for multispectral chromosome images classification.
    Karvelis PS; Fotiadis DI; Georgiou I; Syrrou M
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():3009-12. PubMed ID: 17946153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
    Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic karyotyping of metaphase cells with overlapping chromosomes.
    Popescu M; Gader P; Keller J; Klein C; Stanley J; Caldwell C
    Comput Biol Med; 1999 Jan; 29(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 10207655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic karyotype analysis.
    Graham J; Piper J
    Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():141-85. PubMed ID: 8032408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stylized chromosome images.
    Martin AO; Isenstein BS; Thomas CW; Rzeszotarski MS; Johnson WE
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 2307061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
    Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Band features as classification measures for G-banded chromosome analysis.
    Johnston DA; Tang KS; Zimmerman S
    Comput Biol Med; 1993 Mar; 23(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 8513663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel metric for bone marrow cells chromosome pairing.
    Khmelinskii A; Ventura R; Sanches J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1420-9. PubMed ID: 20172790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.