These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19163290)

  • 1. Comparison and evaluation of leakage flux on various types of dental magnetic attachment.
    Nishida M; Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2813-6. PubMed ID: 19163290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of leakage flux out of a dental magnetic attachment.
    Nishida M; Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3520-3. PubMed ID: 18002756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Measurements of the flux densities of static magnetic fields generated by two types of dental magnetic attachments and their retentive forces].
    Xu C; Chao YL; Du L; Yang L
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 15181852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental magnetic attachment: toward third generation devices.
    Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1185-90. PubMed ID: 18334412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachment in various keeper and magnetic assembly combinations.
    Hasegawa M; Umekawa Y; Nagai E; Ishigami T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Apr; 105(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21458652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic attachment for esthetic management of an overdenture.
    Kokubo Y; Fukushima S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):354-5. PubMed ID: 12426509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of repeated insertion-removal cycles on the force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachments: an in vitro study.
    Hao Z; Chao Y; Meng Y; Yin H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 24439071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures--an in vitro study.
    Setz JM; Wright PS; Ferman AM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 11203675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tooth-supported, magnet-retained overdentures: a review.
    Vere J; Deans RF
    Dent Update; 2009 Jun; 36(5):305-8, 310. PubMed ID: 19585854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of rigid and nonrigid extracoronal attachments on supporting tissues in extension base partial removable dental prostheses: a nonlinear finite element study.
    Wang HY; Zhang YM; Yao D; Chen JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 May; 105(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 21530760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a self-adjusting magnetic attachment for implant overdentures.
    Maeda Y; Yang TC; Kinoshita Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 21519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attachment use for abutment supported prostheses.
    Mentag PJ; Kosinski TF
    Dent Today; 1990 Sep; 9(7):52-3. PubMed ID: 2132098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report.
    Ceruti P; Bryant SR; Lee JH; MacEntee MI
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a52. PubMed ID: 20943036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removable magnetic dental attachment that permits magnetic resonance imaging.
    Masumi S; Nagatomi K; Miyake S; Toyoda S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):698-701. PubMed ID: 1403952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Techniques for incorporation of attachments in implant-retained overdentures with unsplinted abutments.
    Bidra AS; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Lee C; Ortegon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 May; 107(5):288-99. PubMed ID: 22546306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Viability of magnetic denture retainers: a 3-year case report.
    Thean HP; Khor SK; Loh PL
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 11495563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
    Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical comparison of prosthetic complications of implant-supported overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Karabuda C; Yaltirik M; Bayraktar M
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 18332760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):608-15. PubMed ID: 18761583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.