122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19163290)
1. Comparison and evaluation of leakage flux on various types of dental magnetic attachment.
Nishida M; Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2813-6. PubMed ID: 19163290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of leakage flux out of a dental magnetic attachment.
Nishida M; Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3520-3. PubMed ID: 18002756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Measurements of the flux densities of static magnetic fields generated by two types of dental magnetic attachments and their retentive forces].
Xu C; Chao YL; Du L; Yang L
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 15181852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental magnetic attachment: toward third generation devices.
Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1185-90. PubMed ID: 18334412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retentive force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachment in various keeper and magnetic assembly combinations.
Hasegawa M; Umekawa Y; Nagai E; Ishigami T
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Apr; 105(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21458652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic attachment for esthetic management of an overdenture.
Kokubo Y; Fukushima S
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):354-5. PubMed ID: 12426509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of repeated insertion-removal cycles on the force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachments: an in vitro study.
Hao Z; Chao Y; Meng Y; Yin H
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 24439071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of attachment type on the mobility of implant-stabilized overdentures--an in vitro study.
Setz JM; Wright PS; Ferman AM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 11203675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tooth-supported, magnet-retained overdentures: a review.
Vere J; Deans RF
Dent Update; 2009 Jun; 36(5):305-8, 310. PubMed ID: 19585854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of rigid and nonrigid extracoronal attachments on supporting tissues in extension base partial removable dental prostheses: a nonlinear finite element study.
Wang HY; Zhang YM; Yao D; Chen JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 May; 105(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 21530760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a self-adjusting magnetic attachment for implant overdentures.
Maeda Y; Yang TC; Kinoshita Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 21519571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attachment use for abutment supported prostheses.
Mentag PJ; Kosinski TF
Dent Today; 1990 Sep; 9(7):52-3. PubMed ID: 2132098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report.
Ceruti P; Bryant SR; Lee JH; MacEntee MI
J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a52. PubMed ID: 20943036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removable magnetic dental attachment that permits magnetic resonance imaging.
Masumi S; Nagatomi K; Miyake S; Toyoda S
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):698-701. PubMed ID: 1403952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Techniques for incorporation of attachments in implant-retained overdentures with unsplinted abutments.
Bidra AS; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Lee C; Ortegon S
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 May; 107(5):288-99. PubMed ID: 22546306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Viability of magnetic denture retainers: a 3-year case report.
Thean HP; Khor SK; Loh PL
Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 11495563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical comparison of prosthetic complications of implant-supported overdentures with different attachment systems.
Karabuda C; Yaltirik M; Bayraktar M
Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 18332760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):608-15. PubMed ID: 18761583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
