These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19163326)

  • 21. On the controversy about the sharpness of human cochlear tuning.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martin A
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 14(5):673-86. PubMed ID: 23690279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Derived acoustically evoked brainstem responses by means of narrow-band and notched-noise masking in normal-hearing subjects.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 6463552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory suppression and frequency selectivity in older and younger adults.
    Sommers MS; Gehr SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1067-74. PubMed ID: 9479760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phase-dependent audiometry with low-frequency masking revisited.
    Rahne T; Rasinski C; Neumann K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 May; 188(2):302-4. PubMed ID: 20171987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods.
    Moore BCJ; Wan J; Varathanathan A; Naddell S; Baer T
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519841980. PubMed ID: 31081487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An objective assessment method for frequency selectivity of the human auditory system.
    Gong Q; Wang Y; Xian M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Dec; 13():171. PubMed ID: 25522838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distortion product otoacoustic emission of symphony orchestra musicians before and after rehearsal.
    Reuter K; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):327-36. PubMed ID: 17297787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Oct; 76(4):1057-66. PubMed ID: 6501701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the roex and gammachirp filters as representations of the auditory filter.
    Unoki M; Irino T; Glasberg B; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1474-92. PubMed ID: 17004470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wavelet and matching pursuit estimates of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission latency.
    Notaro G; Al-Maamury AM; Moleti A; Sisto R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3576-85. PubMed ID: 18247765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Broadened forward-masked tuning curves from intense masking tones: delay-time and probe-level manipulations.
    Nelson DA; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 May; 75(5):1570-7. PubMed ID: 6736419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Frequency discrimination at 1200 Hz in the presence of high-frequency masking noise.
    Nelson DA; Stanton ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 7085971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.
    Oxenham AJ; Simonson AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):444-53. PubMed ID: 16454299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Psychophysical auditory filter estimates reveal sharper cochlear tuning in musicians.
    Bidelman GM; Schug JM; Jennings SG; Bhagat SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):EL33-9. PubMed ID: 24993235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantifying the implications of nonlinear cochlear tuning for auditory-filter estimates.
    Heinz MG; Colburn HS; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Feb; 111(2):996-1011. PubMed ID: 11863202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporary off-frequency listening after noise trauma.
    Etchelecou MC; Coulet O; Derkenne R; Tomasi M; Noreña AJ
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):81-91. PubMed ID: 21986211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of low-pass noise in word-recognition testing.
    Cohen RL; Keith RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Mar; 19(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 1271800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.