BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19163345)

  • 1. A Self Organizing Map approach to breast cancer detection.
    Oprea AE; Strungaru R; Ungureanu GM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3032-5. PubMed ID: 19163345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Local Binary Patterns Descriptor Based on Sparse Curvelet Coefficients for False-Positive Reduction in Mammograms.
    Pawar MM; Talbar SN; Dudhane A
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():5940436. PubMed ID: 30356422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
    Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Correa JL; Vidal JJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1996 May; 49(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8800610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters.
    Kallergi M
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):314-26. PubMed ID: 15000617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerized detection of malignant tumors on digital mammograms.
    Kobatake H; Murakami M; Takeo H; Nawano S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 May; 18(5):369-78. PubMed ID: 10416798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
    Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study of the effect of breast tissue density on detection of masses in mammograms.
    García-Manso A; García-Orellana CJ; González-Velasco HM; Gallardo-Caballero R; Macías-Macías M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():213794. PubMed ID: 23573165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A ranklet-based image representation for mass classification in digital mammograms.
    Masotti M
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17089857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of a novel mass detection algorithm in mammograms.
    Kozegar E; Soryani M; Minaei B; Domingues I
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(4):592-600. PubMed ID: 24518702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
    van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Segmentation of suspicious densities in digital mammograms.
    te Brake GM; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 11243351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current challenges of full field digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 16461520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An approach to the detection of lesions in mammograms using fuzzy image processing.
    Bayram B; Acar U
    J Int Med Res; 2007; 35(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 18034992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer aided detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Boccignone G; Chianese A; Picariello A
    Comput Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 30(5):267-86. PubMed ID: 10913773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms.
    Bick U; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 9419517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.